Brainwashed Woman

Dawkins is such a gentleman and scientific genius, how he puts up with this woman's ignorant rubbish/ nonsense is beyond me"¦
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWB6Yhxqy5k

Still the best answer "¦
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPXEdJ_Gtx0

More ......"¦
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cey35bBWXls

Wendy is definitely "Wright" about one thing. Evolution is a questionable theory when you consider how misguided and ignorant an individual she has become. I would say, "has evolved into", but clearly the process has passed her by. Either that or she's just a bit thick.

Thanks, Prince Albert. The first video was interesting to watch. I wonder if she was aware of the tangled web of nonsense she was weaving.

While I agree that those are prime examples of stupidity, I could probably find the same cleverness with balls attached in a 2 mile radius , excluding the center, of course .

Hey and stop asking those mean trick questions

If you want to get rid of pesky feminists that may follow you on IG or Facebook, just post this. It works!

So if evolution didn't happen and God created man, then woman, not only did God create woment for companionship but obviously for our amusement too........

God is clearly a man.......... with a good sense of humour

Dawkins is a hateful and obnoxious little man. He's intelligent, but hopelessly misguided.

The origins debate is almost always framed wrong. Evolution must be carefully defined. Bacteria to man evolution has nothing to do with "science". "Mutations did it" is impossible fantasy and counter to all observation and testing. Everything about DNA demonstrates engineered function that has absolutely nothing to do with chance/randomness/chaos. What Darwin actually observed on the Galapagos and what he wrote about in "Origin of the Species" is fact, but it has nothing to do with origins from an absolute standpoint.

Adaptation, speciation, selection, and genetic drift within fixed genus/family lines is irrefutable fact, everything else is worthless speculation from an empirical science standpoint. Sadly, many people involved in this debate make insane logic jumps from speciation to cross family/genus "jumps", for which there is zero evidence both in the fossil record and through observable time. In fact, the trend of all life is toward declining biological diversity and countless extinctions, nothing "new" ever forms. Reproduction is the engine of true evolution and reproduction only occurs within fixed lines. There are no "transitions" in the record other than those by claim/fiat. It's all endless circular reasoning, conclusion jumping, and strawman arguments - I've heard them all in 20+ years involved in this debate.

Origins is the single most important issue to anyone alive and your beliefs there affect everything else about one's world view. Get it wrong there and you think wrong about many other things.

Although this guy didn't believe in the God of scripture, he absolutely believed in a Creator/Engineer/Architect of life and the universe as a whole - and he blows Dawkins off the table. The best physicists that ever lived (with the possible exception of voice box man) were all Creationists. It is the ONLY logical view, period.

I am not an atheist, and I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws. Our limited minds grasp the mysterious force that moves the constellations.’ (Quoted in M. Jammer, Einstein and Religion, Princeton 1999, p. 48.)

'Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics, and it springs from the same source. They are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who - in their grudge against the traditional "opium for the people" - cannot bear the music of the spheres. The Wonder of nature does not becomes smaller because one cannot measure it by the standards of human moral and human aims.' (ibid, p. 97.)

If you want to hear a real apologist, not some random loon on youtube, I recommend Cornelius Hunter. His book "Darwin's God" is an excellent read and captures the core of every single anti-theist position: "God wouldn't have done it this way!" (allowed suffering, disease, and death)

Darwin's God

So you believe in a "creator" then…

This thread took a strange turn.

haha

Yes I do. It takes a lot more faith to believe in the odds of all the changes it would take at the same time in perfect order. (Impossible odds). No matter how much time goes by. Using science that you espouse look at the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It states that any matter left alone will always break down/degrade. Organisms do not mutate and improve themselves. That is why we age. Get cancer and the engines and parts in our bikes eventually wear out. Dawkins may be a gentleman but he is an atheist and has to overlook real scientific facts that all scientists know but some wont admit..in order to back up the THEORY of evolution. Show me ONE missing link/evolutionary fossil. There should be billions of them if the evolution theory was correct. Even Darwin admitted that.

It takes a lot more faith to believe in evolutions than it does in a Creator.
I call that creator God.. Others may call it something else but not to believe in a creator is folly ..

The most important moment of our lives will be the very moment of our death.

Speedy

Prince Albert said:

Dawkins is such a gentleman and scientific genius, how he puts up with this woman's ignorant rubbish/ nonsense is beyond me"¦
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWB6Yhxqy5k

Click to expand...

'So you believe you came from the goo to you huh? LOL... NO creator...?

With all respect...

Darwin in his day. Said that if his THEORY was to be correct, there would have to be millions of transitional fossils to show adaptive changes from one species to another. Where are they? We have never found one.... How can any species change from one thing to another (with complementary male and female organs) and then just by chance over millions and millions of years no less) become a totally new species? * I do believe there are obviously adaptations due to environment (within a species) such as cross breeding etc. and due to environmental changes etc..but there is and has been NO REAL proof of a transition from one species to another except in the fertile imagination of evolutionist...
It is mathematically impossible.. For just one of millions of changes to be made to change one species to another the probability would be infinity/ impossible..
Ask yourself this...How many people that play the lottery get 6 out of 50 numbers to hit the lottery? Maybe a few here and there right? Imagine if they had to pick 6 out of a billion and do it time and time and time again each time and pick the right numbers every time? Even those odds are better than what it would take for any complex organism to evolve (with both sexes at the same time no less) with of course complimentary sexual organs and all the other necessary organs etc to live and reproduce.. Look around you.. Everything has a creator...Nothing came out of nothing.. If you don't want to believe in God that is your right but it doesn't change the fact that we were all created beings...

Question.. If we evolved from monkeys.. (In other words Monkeys through the millions of years changed slowly and adapted through countless trials and errors by pure chance /nature to change into humans, then why are there still monkeys?? Why are they still here if they evolved into humans LOL
For any species to evolve it has to have many many complementary functions to evolve at the same time.. If a fish developed into a bird it first had to slowly develop wings and feathers right?. It would not happen overnight. According to the evolution theory it would take thousands (if not millions) of years right..? That means in this example that a fish for thousands of years would have a feather like appendage on its body with no useful purpose LOL
I would think that if the theory of evolution was correct then that appendage would be disappearing soon since it had absolutely NO use and other fish (without the fishy wings) would mate and breed out the fish with the useless appendage...... That in itself would mean the fish would not survive due to the theory you are using to establish evolution. Adaptive change does happen but not from one species to another..If the adaptation was not useful the organism would not survive the many times it would take to reproduce and keep the change in the successive generations.. We have not even mentioned all the other muscles and other tissues it would take to support the wing LOL. In my opinion Richard Dawkiins is the ...... He is very charming and tells a good story (that evolutionist want to hear and believe) but he is the one that is closed minded to the facts. He is an atheist.. He has to have much more faith in his ridiculous theory of evolution that a Christian would to believe that there is a creator... We are given proof of creation every day of our lives.. Just look around.
Creation makes the most sense.. At least to me...

To each his own. I will pray for you man!

Speedy

speedy14 said:

Creation makes the most sense.. At least to me

Click to expand...

Sure - life is engineered, not sure how anyone can't see the obvious. "Mutations did it" is nothing more than a fantasy for atheists/agnostics.

fzr100098 said:

Sure - life is engineered, not sure how anyone can't see the obvious. "Mutations did it" is nothing more than a fantasy for atheists/agnostics.

Click to expand...

They don't want to see it.. If they admit there is a Creator then they have to admit that there is a God (and facing their sins,,, that is the real problem with them) They want to act however and do whatever they want and not have to face their creator so they choose to not believe in one.. They chose "not to believe" and look for any way around it no matter how ridiculous it seems. Well you don't have to believe in gravity but that still doesn't stop you from falling if you jump of the window of a 20 story building..

Until the Scopes trial in 1925 Creation was taught in school and evolutionist's theories were considered of dubious validity. Schools taught biblical Creation The famous defense attorney Clarence Darrow (an agnostic) defended Scopes for teaching evolution in school, (John Thomas Scopes had been teaching from a textbook by George William Hunter, that described the theory of evolution, race and eugenics..)
After the trial.. Evolution was allowed to be taught in schools and from there it progressed into the modern day.. Now we are not allowed to discuss God or Jesus or Creation in school. Of course it is OK to talk about the Muslim faith and Mohamed etc.. My how the world has changed.
This county has completely lost its moral compass.. Anything goes now. and it is going in the wrong direction.. . I miss the country we used to live in..


Speedy

If you believe you're highly evolved slime, there is no absolute morality and life becomes the satanic creedo: "do what thou will - and get back at anyone in your way"

One of those guys in Columbine wore a t-shirt that read "survival of the fittest"

Where do Ducatis come from?

You guys have got to be kidding, the church has no moral high ground here at all, every major war in history has been fought under a religious banner and we shouldn't even mention the fact that .......... appears to be a subject taught at the seminary, shall we discuss Billy Graham and the thousands of other television evangelists that have wealth beyond most peoples dreams and are moral vacuums themselves. The church has lost all credibility in modern times, if it ever had any to begin with.