- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 8,402
- Location
- here
Looks good on the spec. sheet, but...
That rear end..... Really?
That's where all the lost 1199 passenger seat covers ended up
Looks good on the spec. sheet, but...
That rear end..... Really?
Do it. When the bike is no longer in production and you have one, it will be one of the most unique bikes you own, regardless of what else is in your garage. Even more unique and interesting than your SL, I wager. Only other thing in the running would be a Vyrus 986 M2 or 987 C3 4V, but the Tesi will always be the original design.
Sorry for the derailment fellas, I just want to see Jello get one of these fancy Bimotas too. Living my dream, he is.
Kawasaki Unveils the Track Only 2015 Ninja H2R - Street Model H2 in November - Featured News
H2R is the only model being released at the moment.. and yes through its limited release it supposedly stated that is has upwards to 300 hp....
Goddamnit... I so want to like this bike enough to buy it. With +1 support it becomes even more practical, but with <100 hp and a dry clutch I just can't do it.
Ok.... Now you have my attention..... Hmmmm.....
300 HP is absolutely incredible - exceeding MotoGP power incredible. This figure will certainly be reduced for the street version.
MCN says that the road-going H2 will be reduced around 80hp from this H2R. Of course, they did predict that it would have a beam-type frame and NOT a trellis, even though they knew about the trellis frame in the recent Kwak patent filings.
An 80 HP reduction sounds probable, and yet it still surpasses anything else on the market. I'm sure the power delivery on a supercharged sportbike, even at 220-225 HP, is going to be unlike anything most riders have experienced. If the reduction is primarily due to an electronic governor, I don't imagine it will be too difficult to unleash the restricted ponies.
Sounds reasonable. Why restrict it at all from the H2R? And why so much? The Japanese mindset is just strange to me.
Am I seeing the right pics???
The track bike has no lower fairing or catch pan? Is this the first time these engineers have made a bike? All newbs or something? Or is this for novice/C group only? Makes about as much sense as the R or SL coming without a pan.
I suspect they are concerned about provoking regulation. So introduce something that is a clearly ahead of others, but not too far ahead on paper to raise drama and the ire of regulators.