Well, there you have it

Phl said:

yeah, listen to Joe Rogan #1671 ... about smart people being de-platformed and how cheap and effective Ivermectin is.

Click to expand...

Twisted10 said:

If they lock us down again im going to live in the woods. F it. Amish can do it so can i.

Click to expand...

Vbreeze said:

Ya exactly. hahaha. Hilarious. Covid is the new boogyman and all the new fuckery is aimed at the hand-fed morons who will get in line with their “EU greenpass” so they can leave their house. How do you think that illegal non-legislation masterclass piece of propaganda will evolve?
Apologies for the “I heard” however it’s first hand from my dear friend who IS a PhD & MD virologist and vaccine scientist. He and hundreds of other doctors are curing thousands of people of covid with $2.00 medicine in pill form that‘s been in use for years for other things. They’re working over the phone for free night and day. They have 0 losses, 0 ICU hospitalizations. Their evaluation of the vaccines is: “This is complete ..... Don’t get it.” Which is why they’re working night and day for free. They’re telling me this is a war inside the medical Industry. And you guessed it, it’s all about money.
What’s bad about the covid shots besides the potential individual damage is the tendency for viral mutations as the shots do not kill the virus like the pills do. So people who’ve got the covid shots continue to carry the virus and can develop mutations immune to the shots. Brilliant. It’s similar to what caused the crisis we have with antibiotics.
Add me to the list:

I got a virus In July and felt like I was falling down a black hole. Fever out of control - couldn't eat. Took first pill of 3 pills, fever stabilized in :30 mins. I started breathing better. 3hours later I started eating again. Next day pill#2, I got out of bed. Day 3, 3rd final pill, up and around. Day 4 like it didn’t happen except a little tired.

They are getting published but no mainstream coverage.

I can’t say I believe there is a master plan for mind control however it’s easy to see the powerful will take advantage of any chaos to increase their wealth and power because that’s what they always do. If it’s local admin or big pharma standing to make a cool $trillion a year up for grabs scaring everyone into taking an ANNUAL untested shot with no ability to sue for malpractice if it screws you up, it’s the same story. Everyone seems to be jumping in to claim something special from this global shitshow.

I was in the first “red zone” in Europe. Spread was 200X the first wkend. We were scared shitless, taped the windows shut and hunkered for months. They pounded us with fear hourly as we watched businesses go under and families lose everything. I can’t say “oh ya, no one fooled me.” We got fooled.
Now, that’s enough. Full stop.

This is what I took. Get the email off the package, order some. Talk to the right doctor for you. If you get sick PM me I’ll hook you up if I can.

Click to expand...

Paul G said:

Jo Rogan- bwwhaahaahaa that nutbag click whoring dwarf. Come on Phil you cannot be serious!!!

Click to expand...

Bo13R said:

Ok Mr. End of the world by COVID!
Check Harvard University professor / epidemiologist Martin Kuldorff and get educated!!!

Click to expand...

Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns

The preprint endorsing ivermectin as a coronavirus therapy has been widely cited, but independent researchers find glaring discrepancies in the data

www.theguardian.com

A medical student in London, Jack Lawrence, was among the first to identify serious concerns about the paper, leading to the retraction. He first became aware of the Elgazzar preprint when it was assigned to him by one of his lecturers for an assignment that formed part of his master’s degree. He found the introduction section of the paper appeared to have been almost entirely plagiarised.

It appeared that the authors had run entire paragraphs from press releases and websites about ivermectin and Covid-19 through a thesaurus to change key words. “Humorously, this led to them changing ‘severe acute respiratory syndrome’ to ‘extreme intense respiratory syndrome’ on one occasion,” Lawrence said.

The data also looked suspicious to Lawrence, with the raw data apparently contradicting the study protocol on several occasions.

“The authors claimed to have done the study only on 18-80 year olds, but at least three patients in the dataset were under 18,” Lawrence said.

“The authors claimed they conducted the study between the 8th of June and 20th of September 2020, however most of the patients who died were admitted into hospital and died before the 8th of June according to the raw data. The data was also terribly formatted, and includes one patient who left hospital on the non-existent date of 31/06/2020.”

There were other concerns.

“In their paper, the authors claim that four out of 100 patients died in their standard treatment group for mild and moderate Covid-19,” Lawrence said. “According to the original data, the number was 0, the same as the ivermectin treatment group. In their ivermectin treatment group for severe Covid-19, the authors claim two patients died, but the number in their raw data is four.”

Lawrence and the Guardian sent Elgazzar a comprehensive list of questions about the data, but did not receive a reply. The university’s press office also did not respond.

Lawrence contacted an Australian chronic disease epidemiologist from the University of Wollongong, Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, and a data analyst affiliated with Linnaeus University in Sweden who reviews scientific papers for errors, Nick Brown, for help analysing the data and study results more thoroughly.

Brown created a comprehensive document uncovering numerous data errors, discrepancies and concerns, which he provided to the Guardian. According to his findings the authors had clearly repeated data between patients.

“The main error is that at least 79 of the patient records are obvious clones of other records,” Brown told the Guardian. “It’s certainly the hardest to explain away as innocent error, especially since the clones aren’t even pure copies. There are signs that they have tried to change one or two fields to make them look more natural.”

Other studies on ivermectin are still under way. In the UK, the University of Oxford is testing whether giving people with Covid-19 ivermectin prevents them ending up in hospital.

The Elgazzar study was one of the the largest and most promising showing the drug may help Covid patients, and has often been cited by proponents of the drug as evidence of its effectiveness. This is despite a peer-reviewed paper published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases in June finding ivermectin is “not a viable option to treat COVID-19 patients”.

Meyerowitz-Katz told the Guardian that “this is one of the biggest ivermectin studies out there”, and it appeared to him the data was “just totally faked”. This was concerning because two meta-analyses of ivermectin for treating Covid-19 had included the Elgazzar study in the results. A meta-analysis is a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies to determine what the overall scientific literature has found about a treatment or intervention.

“Because the Elgazzar study is so large, and so massively positive – showing a 90% reduction in mortality – it hugely skews the evidence in favour of ivermectin,” Meyerowitz-Katz said.

“If you remove this one study from the scientific literature, suddenly there are very few positive randomised control trials of ivermectin for Covid-19. Indeed, if you get rid of just this research, most meta-analyses that have found positive results would have their conclusions entirely reversed.”

Click to expand...

Bo13R said:

Lo and behold same .... exist for Vaxx but you can't find it because global media overlords will not allowed it to be seen by regular people.

Click to expand...

Paul G said:

......' reptilian overlords, I hate those guys

Click to expand...