Mr Alpina, again good post and accurate. Those original Ti swingarm shafts were from Podium (they still sell them) the new shafts are of a larger wall thickness on the drive side and have a steel sleeve pressed on the needle bearing side. With regard to the the trellis frame, Tamburini and NCR have both made Ti replacement frames (same diameter tubing as the pieces need to fit) for Ducati’s for years without issue. With regard to the axle from BDS, you didn’t go into material specifications so comparing Ti to steel so it makes the points of contention somewhat difficult. The fact that these axles are on quite a few Ducati’s and MVs with a considerable amount of road miles is a testament to the design, material selection and reliability. Additionally, your particular application being a static display would should not warrant any of those concerns so I’m not sure what the relevance was to the critique in your particular application. Anyhow, the bike looks great, nice work.
Mr endodoc,
I don't know about the Tamburini and NCR replacement trellis frame, but I am confident if it is the same geometry (same amount of interlocking tubing) and same tubing diameter, those Ti replacement frames will have more flex and less rigid than the original Ducati steel trellis frame.
The BDS rear axle Ti Material based on the invoice you posted (picture below) is Titanium Grade.5 Ti-6AL-4V which is of course a very good material.
It is also the same exact Ti Grade used by ProTi for their bolts, plus ProTi even applied FORGING to make it even stronger (I don't think BDS applied forging process).
Below is the official explanation from ProTi that for larger size bolts (thus larger torque tightening), it warn user of their ProTi Titanium Grade.5 Ti-6AL-4V FORGED bolts to Reduce the torque by 15%:
PROTI Fully Forged 64 Titanium Bolts, Panigale,S1000RR,RSV4
Even ProTi admit that their bolt is not able to handle the torque as the original steel bolts.
This despite their claim that the combination of their material and forging allow them to match grade 10.9 steel, below is the page where they claim this (you need to scroll down further):
PROTI Fully Forged 64 Titanium Bolts, Panigale,S1000RR,RSV4
FYI, I actually waiting for my FRONT Titanium Axle from ZETA racing to arrive which also have the same material.
So, why I am willing to use it for my FRONT axle but not REAR axle? Because the REAR axle also need to cope with our high power over 200 horsepower engine, thus more load/stress.
I understand that there are other Ducati/MV Agusta that had been using BDS Titanium rear axle safely, however, there is no real data on how many miles, what kind of driving, environment etc.
Plus our Panigale V4 came with such a powerful engine.
This BDS rear axle is NOT a factory tested parts. What happened if it fail? Do you think you can just file lawsuit to BDS? Lawsuit cost money, and if you already crippled or die, well, is it worth the money from lawsuit?
Also, will BDS even have money to pay for the compensation if you win?
and since they are in Germany, people in USA who buy those BDS Titanium Rear Axle from You, Endodoc, might just file lawsuit to you. This is a LIABILITY...
and signing a disclosure saying this is for racing use only, well, let's just say the legal cost just to defend yourself is very high.
Regarding your last statement:
Additionally, your particular application being a static display would should not warrant any of those concerns so I’m not sure what the relevance was to the critique in your particular application.
I want to copy and paste your exact sentence that you posted above as my answer:
Ok here we go again with the sensitivity police.
Seriously, why you always critique people who modified their bike for looks? or as in your cynical word "decoration"?
Don't worry, people who want to buy "racing grade parts" from you will still buy from you.
I mean,... yes some of them might allocated their budget away for some nice looking "decorative" parts after they saw it here...
but hey, market trend change, people getting older... the seller need to follow the market
Now, despite my bike build goal for "decoration", I still want to make it real world worthy and safe from engineering point of view. who knows, I might be tempted to ride it one day or give it to my children or grandchildren,
and the last thing I want to hear is, grandpa cause grandson/granddaughter have accident because grandpa was so egoistic in showing off that he choose unsafe parts to modify his bike...
and in this forum, I want to contribute with the knowledge I knew, because I also don't want to see other forum member disappointed or even worse have accident. (or in your case, have lawsuit files against you).
Note: I contacted almost every Titanium Machining Facility in the USA (most aerospace supplier), and some of them advise me that it will require a redesign in geometry plus extra forging process just to be able to match the original steel parts.
And with that modification, there goes the weight advantage of using Ti. If I want to keep the design the same, thus less weight than the original steel, I will lose the strength.
Yes, I like to listen to second, third and forth opinions before making my decision and from credible sources.