The price jump to base Panigale (2013 pricing) is $4k, not $3k. $14,995 for 899 (w/standard ABS) vs. $18,995 for base 1199 ABS. $4k is a lot of money to most people buying bikes. What we've witnessed over the past 2 years since the 1199 came out is that the 848 Evo buyer was completely different from the 1199 buyer, and I'm sure our experience here smack dab in the middle of the USA is similar to Ducati as a whole. The 848 Evo buyer wanted a high-performance bike, Ducati style, technology, but in no way wanted either the expense and/or performance of the 1199. It was really two completely different markets for the most part. We sold a lot of 848 Evos to riders who didn't even know the 1199 existed, and when they saw it and heard how much HP it had, they said "Oh, I don't need that". So if that market transfers over to the 899, which I suspect it will, then the majority of 899 buyers will not care if the bike has a DSSA, weighs a few lbs. more than the insanely-light 1199, and is missing a few of the more expensive components from the 1199 (slipper clutch, aluminum tank, etc.). These are not buyers who are on the Ducati forums already, who have a soft spot in their heart for the detailed styling elements, and who will compare the 899 to the 1199 in order to make a purchase decision. These buyers will be comparing the bike to its market competitors (MV 800, 675, and the Jap 600-750 range). For those of us in the minority of 899 buyers (myself included) who are looking at it as a middleweight track tool, we're starting from the same point we did with an 848 Evo, which is that we're taking a bike designed as a street bike and converting it to the track, rather than buying a bike designed for the track (1199). Personally I'd love to have a 350 lb. 699cc 135HP Superquadro track scalpel, but that's not the bike Ducati can sell against the competition to the majority of the market, so that's not what we get!