Potato?
BS bench racing. Just ride. If you can ride the bike to it's 100% limit and it's slower still, then just fix it. I wouldn't talk a BMW guy out of his BMW just because a Panigale was 0.3 seconds faster in a magazine review. There's a thousand things that can give you 0.3 seconds back.
A buddy of mine memorizes every Magazine superbike shootout. He's never been on a track. Likely never will go to the track. So what's the point?
Nailed it.
Im on several brand based forums (and a long time Moderator on one of them) and I can't count how many Magazine Review threads there are. It is almost comical how much stock people put into those things.
Just because somebody went faster/slower while testing for a magazine, that means absolutely nothing when it comes to the final consumer. What is his experience? How fast is in in general? Did they make any changes to the bike (suspension, tires, ergo's, gearing, etc) to try to help him go faster? Did track conditions or ambient temps change from one session to the next? What about tire conditions (did the previous tester get new tires, and when he got on the bike did they already have 20 laps on them)?
0.3sec means he basically missed one apex by a few feet, or he was a split second later getting on the gas exiting one corner, or he missed a shift, or he had a minor wheelspin/slide trying to come out of one corner. I could go on and on. There are a million things that can cause somebody's lap time to be 0.3sec off, and none of those are any indication of the bikes' true capabilities or lack thereof.
Very few people in the galaxy can extract every ounce of performance out of a modern sportbike, even a 600cc. And neither an R1 nor a Panigale will be the limiting factor in an individual's success and/or lap times.
The bike, any bike, is fine...just ride it.