Termi full system want due to heat upgrades

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

Seriously you want to take me to task? I was clarifying what he meant which you missed in his post.

He's referring to the various threads in the forum (from people who have the full system) which to my recollection were bemoaning the minimal performance difference over the slip-ons and that there were numerous full system owners that were hanging out for a new map or some other option to improve performance.

There is soooooo much misinformation but the maths seems pretty clear from what I've seen to date. Feel free to share a dyno chart to prove it otherwise.

The only direct comparison I've seen with the new up-map is this one.

Stock - 172hp
Termi Slip Ons - 181 hp
Full Termi - 185.33 hp

This is the thread I've quoted but there are many others..
http://ducati1199.com/ducati-1199/2891-test-performance-termignoni-new-upmap.html

The Ducati importer in Australian was even advising customers against fitting the system unless they were racing and were prepared to tune the hell out of it. Even the AR guys got only got 187 out of the full system with a rapid bike module.

For some people the extra 4-5hp and the looks and sound of the full system may justify the extra spend but if its power and performance you are after then its pretty hard to argue against the maths.

Slip-ons price $2039 = 9hp = $227/HP
Full System price $3569 = 14hp = $255/HP (being generous and saying 5hp extra)

Jeez just trying to clarify something and I've spent 20mins digging through old threads.

Perfect - this is the way the forum should work. We are all entitiled to our opinions, and if you wish to dispute one, please provide the facts behind the dispute, and instead of yelling louder. Your facts do indeed represent this forum's consensus.
 
My memory is that, the story re slip ons being better and producing more power came from posts made by people pushing another exhaust system.

No axe to grind but that is where I believe it seemed to start. As I am not racing the std exhaust is good enough for me and so far for me heat is not an issue.

+1. Oh yes, I do indeed believe your correct.
 
Your facts do indeed represent this forum's consensus.

Mass hysteria. :D I suppose I could be in denial because I have the full termi's. I'm not disputing what WA wrote and agree it's nice to see facts behind assertions. I'd just like to see more independent data before saying that the full system is a waste of money.
 
Seriously you want to take me to task? I was clarifying what he meant which you missed in his post.

He's referring to the various threads in the forum (from people who have the full system) which to my recollection were bemoaning the minimal performance difference over the slip-ons and that there were numerous full system owners that were hanging out for a new map or some other option to improve performance.

There is soooooo much misinformation but the maths seems pretty clear from what I've seen to date. Feel free to share a dyno chart to prove it otherwise.

The only direct comparison I've seen with the new up-map is this one.

Stock - 172hp
Termi Slip Ons - 181 hp
Full Termi - 185.33 hp

This is the thread I've quoted but there are many others..
http://ducati1199.com/ducati-1199/2891-test-performance-termignoni-new-upmap.html

The Ducati importer in Australian was even advising customers against fitting the system unless they were racing and were prepared to tune the hell out of it. Even the AR guys got only got 187 out of the full system with a rapid bike module.

For some people the extra 4-5hp and the looks and sound of the full system may justify the extra spend but if its power and performance you are after then its pretty hard to argue against the maths.

Slip-ons price $2039 = 9hp = $227/HP
Full System price $3569 = 14hp = $255/HP (being generous and saying 5hp extra)

Jeez just trying to clarify something and I've spent 20mins digging through old threads.

Oh I get it all right and I am not missing the point.

The point I made quite clearly, is that I can not take the opinion of any person seriously when they do not even have the experience to back it up, which in this case is the fact of not only stating opinion on a full termi when you don't even have one but in addition claiming that your opinion is the general consensus.

Do you not think I have access to the same information you have and I actually put my money where my mouth is.

Now, WAfatboy - do you actually have a full termi ?

Like several have posted, if your budget can cover a full termi then it is worth it (in the opinion) of others.

You miss my point - completely.

BTW I am not shouting I am articulating a point - so don't get all .......

First time I have seen a Ducati owner do a $ to HP analysis .. if that were actually a valued metric then maybe people should not even buy a Ducati they should get the Yamaha R1 which totally kills a Ducati on $ to HP.

Therefore, the three things you should take away from my message is (1) I would take it seriously if you have a full termi system (we all have access to the same data on the internet) (2) I don't believe your opinion is the general consensus and (3) I don't believe that $ to HP is a valued or relevant metric on a Ducati (Ducati is not exactly financially competitive) in any context.
 
Last edited:
1. No i dont own the full system, i have an 1199S with Termi Slips, 13,000km on the clock. If one has to own a product to form an opinion, regardless of the available data then that would be rather limiting. An intelligent individual should be able to evaluate the data and form an opinion regardless.

2. My first post was by way of clarification of Icemans and based on the opinions of some that do and some that don't own the full system. It was delivered without prejudice and with the qualification that it was a commonly held view which I backed with some supporting evidence from the forum.

In my experience, by evaluating a range of opinions from individuals that have consistently demonstrated sound judgement, and with the aid of supporting data, it is possible to make valid purchase decisions.

In this instance there is potentially a value judgement to be made - get 70% of the power for 57% of the price of a full system. It is only one piece of the puzzle, looks, sound and other performance issues such as torque, rideability are all factors that will no doubt impact a personal opinion. Which btw Is why I have not questioned the validity of your opinion. You clearly don't agree which is your prerogative.

3. I'd hazard a guess I've owned more Italian machinery or the two and four wheeled variety than most in the last 25 years so I understand full well my motivations for buying the things both emotional and rational. Power is both a rational and an emotional metric. In the early days of this forum when the first bikes were being delivered and dyno'd there were a lot of people feeling pretty disappointed having gone with their emotions with the 'assurance' that the were getting the rational numbers to back up their purchase.

You also seem to keep referencing 'funds' as if being able to have the money to buy is somehow the only defining issue. Price is irrelevant if the individuals perceived value of the product is high enough. Many people have voted with their wallets and decided to go with the full system and others have made decided on slips but both perceive their decision to be correct. I've put the savings towards a deposit on the new BMW HP4 - my value judgement.

The impression you give with your 'take you seriously comments' is that somehow my opinion, or that of numerous forum members is less valid than your own. I'm glad that other members have a more open mind and a more inclusive approach.

Me thinks you protest too much ;)
 
1. No i dont own the full system, i have an 1199S with Termi Slips, 13,000km on the clock. If one has to own a product to form an opinion, regardless of the available data then that would be rather limiting. An intelligent individual should be able to evaluate the data and form an opinion regardless.

2. My first post was by way of clarification of Icemans and based on the opinions of some that do and some that don't own the full system. It was delivered without prejudice and with the qualification that it was a commonly held view which I backed with some supporting evidence from the forum.

In my experience, by evaluating a range of opinions from individuals that have consistently demonstrated sound judgement, and with the aid of supporting data, it is possible to make valid purchase decisions.

In this instance there is potentially a value judgement to be made - get 70% of the power for 57% of the price of a full system. It is only one piece of the puzzle, looks, sound and other performance issues such as torque, rideability are all factors that will no doubt impact a personal opinion. Which btw Is why I have not questioned the validity of your opinion. You clearly don't agree which is your prerogative.

3. I'd hazard a guess I've owned more Italian machinery or the two and four wheeled variety than most in the last 25 years so I understand full well my motivations for buying the things both emotional and rational. Power is both a rational and an emotional metric. In the early days of this forum when the first bikes were being delivered and dyno'd there were a lot of people feeling pretty disappointed having gone with their emotions with the 'assurance' that the were getting the rational numbers to back up their purchase.

You also seem to keep referencing 'funds' as if being able to have the money to buy is somehow the only defining issue. Price is irrelevant if the individuals perceived value of the product is high enough. Many people have voted with their wallets and decided to go with the full system and others have made decided on slips but both perceive their decision to be correct. I've put the savings towards a deposit on the new BMW HP4 - my value judgement.

The impression you give with your 'take you seriously comments' is that somehow my opinion, or that of numerous forum members is less valid than your own. I'm glad that other members have a more open mind and a more inclusive approach.

Me thinks you protest too much ;)

So let me run this down for you .. as all you are doing is digging yourself into a very deep hole :rolleyes:

I reply to the OP as I have access to the same data as others and I actually have practical, applied ownership experience related to the questions asked by the OP ... and I get corrected by you whom lacks the ownership experience of actually having the product in question ... urrrmm .. and then you project my responses as a protest ? No, I am simply correcting a person who decide to half .... correct me and who lacks experience of a product over someone who has.

Then you want to go into the money thing and blah, blah related to who purchasing products regardless of cost and related to 'funds' .. urrmmm ... which you then go onto contradict yourself ... urrrmm .. since when have I ever stated 'money' as being *the* defining issue. Yet you clearly do with a $ vs HP metric !!!! ... your dealing with someone who puts their money where their mouth is and that is self evident as in walk the walk, talk the talk .. Your dealing with a person who is pretty consistent in posting commentary based on ownership experience *and* having access to the same internet based data as you and maybe a few other sources that you do not.

Oh and I do not ever recall ever claiming what a consensus is on anything and especially when you so self evidently do not have said experience. Your sure entitled to have an opinion, although your on shaky ground when you or *anyone* claim to state a consensus experience.

I had my bike in hand in June 2012.

Oh and then you project that I have a closed mind ?!? what because I stand up to what for what I believe in, despite being in the face of someone who escalates personal attacks ... QED.
 
Last edited:
Seriously you want to take me to task? I was clarifying what he meant which you missed in his post.

He's referring to the various threads in the forum (from people who have the full system) which to my recollection were bemoaning the minimal performance difference over the slip-ons and that there were numerous full system owners that were hanging out for a new map or some other option to improve performance.

There is soooooo much misinformation but the maths seems pretty clear from what I've seen to date. Feel free to share a dyno chart to prove it otherwise.

The only direct comparison I've seen with the new up-map is this one.

Stock - 172hp
Termi Slip Ons - 181 hp
Full Termi - 185.33 hp

This is the thread I've quoted but there are many others..
http://ducati1199.com/ducati-1199/2891-test-performance-termignoni-new-upmap.html

The Ducati importer in Australian was even advising customers against fitting the system unless they were racing and were prepared to tune the hell out of it. Even the AR guys got only got 187 out of the full system with a rapid bike module.

For some people the extra 4-5hp and the looks and sound of the full system may justify the extra spend but if its power and performance you are after then its pretty hard to argue against the maths.

Slip-ons price $2039 = 9hp = $227/HP
Full System price $3569 = 14hp = $255/HP (being generous and saying 5hp extra)

Jeez just trying to clarify something and I've spent 20mins digging through old threads.

ah yes, in a way you and your Ducati importer are correct in my opinion, When you make exhaust changes you actually pay more $ for less HP. the benefits from the slip on is that it elimanited the cat and you gain some extra HP due to the unrestricting some of the airflow and that's about it besides sound. The benefit of larger headers on any header system AKRA, AR, Termi etc is that it allows more airflow where you gain a little more HP and pay a lot more, but going to a full system is the first step or foundation to tuning and and here is where you start paying less for a lot more (HP) such cam timing, engine management systems, fuel injection system, intake systems most full header will give you the headroom to make these changes where most stock systems will not. Most headers will give you the headroom for even engine component changes.
 
I'm sorry guys, can you get a room? Or PM? I guess you need to prove to us that each is right - but we don't care. Owning something makes zero difference - I have a radar altimeter on my plane, but that doesn't make me an expert on it, and certainly doesn't discount opinions of those that don't have one.

Please follow this ONE simple rule - Direct your posts to the bike/products. If you want to attack each oter's opinions, PM it, please.
 
Mate you are at the bottom of a very deep hole already, trying to get in there and dig you out. Go back and read the original thread, no-one corrected you, you seem very good at correcting others though :p
 
Unless you count post #33 where technically I am correcting you ;)
 

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions

Back
Top