Just so I understand fully....it doesn't offer real time tuning. It logs with wideband sensors and you can modify the table then apply it? A dyno session would be best where you could work the entire RPM range in every gear. Correct?
Ideally both road and dyno tunes would be best. A dyno can allow for lots of detailed work on the tune when it's a steady state dyno... that is when you're able to hold at any desired rpm/gear and tune varying load (throttle positions). This is the best way to adjust for MBT (maximum brake timing) at any given rpm vs load while using knock detection.I'd rather do it on a dyno. I like the idea of being able to strip off the farings, install it with the widebands, dyno tune then take all that stuff off and button the bike back up.
I had a Tuneboy setup with widebands on my 1199 that I left on and would use a laptop in a backback to record then correct and apply. The speeds you have to be going its a bit much unless you have some straight deserted road you can hit. The wiring for wideband sensors is a bit much length wise. If I were going to leave it on the bike 24/7 I'd be chopping a lot of that wire out and adding my own connectors.
To that end, I think doing the same on the track would be better.
It would depend on the ambient temp and barometric variation between the tracks.To that end, I don't know if the logged data would look that different at 100% throttle in 3rd gear between COTA and Willow Springs.
Because 215-230 hp on a “liter” bike isn’t enough for your street/track bike