2016 Panigale S Throttle issue

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

Status
Thread Closed
The Panigale is a brute and I don't want Ducati to "fix" it because there's already a teddy bear of a superbike with heated grips and cruise control for the people that are into that sort of thing.
 
I have zero issue riding my 1199 in traffic and the 1199 is more manic and un-reserved than the 1299 is. The 1299 is nicer persay.. The Duc is known for bucking people, this is part of what draws people to it. Learn to manage the throttle and clutch or get a KTM RC390
 
Ive been riding street bikes for about 32 years now, mostly Japanese fours and I understand what you are saying. When I bought my 1199 back in 2012 I first thought the same thing took a few miles to get use to it. Now after test riding all the new 2015 bikes I ended up with the 1299 S. Everything I rode just didn't have enough power/torque down low after coming from the 1199 so I ended up with the 1299S which has even more power/torque. Going around corners while rolling on the throttle can be tricky on the Panigale and I said this before the 1199/1299 Panigale is really for an advance rider. Sure you can putt around town/canyons/track on the beast but it captures 100 percent of your attention all the time. Knowing which gear to be in and how much throttle to give it just takes practice. It will be second nature after a while.

The bikes I test rode R1, ZX10, S100RR and Finally The RSV4 RR are so gutless down low that you really don't have to pay attention or worry that the bike is going to get away from you while cornering but you have to really spin it up to exit the corners which could be a task in itself. The Ducati twin was made this way to be quicker entering, mid and exiting a corner. This is how they won so many championships throughout the years and they seem to want to stick to it.
(The new R1 seems to be really choppy down low also but with less torque than the Panigale)

It just takes practice like anything else. Good luck and don't give so quickly on the bike give it a chance like I did. Maybe play with the gearing and tune to see if it gets better.
 
To the OP....you might try a dyno session and see if they can get a view of what your air/fuel mix is doing - more than likely it can be smoothed over - I had exactly the same "choppiness" you refer to in the 3 to 6000 rpm window...very annoying, uncomfortable, and down right unsettling, and frustrating (I've run out of adjectives) but i guess I found my way to live with it, as I always disliked the "highway cruise" in traffic as the mandatory punishment to get to the backroads - however I did live with it for 15,000 miles (2013R) selling it in favor of a 2015R, which by the way, does not have the same problem :)

Me being you, as frustrated as you seem to be, I'd try a dyno run

Be sure to post your results so everyone can welcome you back :)
 
Class A troll job?

It's got to be. No one is dumb enough to buy a $30k bike he already knew he hated, and give it a solid 40 miles to adjust to before selling it...are they:rolleyes:

Seems like maybe markny created a second profile to further profess his love for Ducati:D
 
Last edited:
I picked up a 2016 Panigale 1299 S a few weeks ago and finally had a chance to ride it on Sunday (I work 6 days a week and weather hasn't been all that great lately), and put about 40 miles on it.

Today I am sitting here contemplating on selling the stupid bike. And here is the reason why. While riding on the street like a normal human being, the bike simply doesn't work. Every turn I make on the street is a gamble with my life on this thing. Its nearly impossible to modulate the god damn throttle to make the POS turn smoothly without it bucking or surging, even in WET MODE with all the electronic aids turned on! What is the point of riding a bike that has such a huge learning curve and high risk factor? Sure, if you're a dare devil or an adrenaline junky, the story might be different. But I am not willing to take that kind of risk with my life. And having paid close to thirty thousand dollars for this ....... garbage, using it only for track seems like a huge waste, because I paid a hefty premium for those ridiculously unusable headlights, turn signals and mirrors. In every aspect, this bike is nothing more than a showoff piece.

Some people say this bike is an "angry machine". Well, currently I am angrier than it, because I bought into the hype. Last time I rode a Ducati was when they came out with 1198 with a big hype surrounding it just like they do with all of their new bikes. When I test rode it, I absolutely hated it. I just don't understand their logic and their concept of making gazillion ft.lbs of torque at low rpm range which cannot be predictably controlled. Ducati chose the wrong path with their engine concept. To me, it was a ...... up design from the start and they were stuck with it. So they had to patch it up as much as they possible could, wrap it up in pretty plastic covers and had their marketing team go to work.

And so many years later, they still carry on their stupid concept. It doesn't matter riders couldn't handle 60ft.lb of torque 5 years ago, ducati is going to make a 100ft.lb torque machine where riders only used 5% of its power on the pavement they ride 90% of the time. And they didn't care that the 80% of its power could not be properly managed on the street, because its a "race bike", "you have to be angry to ride it" (are you ....... promoting road rage?), "just ride it faster" (and kill yourself)?, get an aftermarket ECU modulator (which may not work) and pay another grand on top of what you already paid for the "most advanced bike in the world?" c'mon! Give me a break!

Ducatis arrogance is appalling. Their attitude is simply irresponsible and it clearly shows that Ducati as a company does not care about the safety of its consumers, but rather consider their customers to be a bunch of ....... with a death wish who will eventually Darwin themselves out using the crude tools they've provided.

I foresee that Ducati will dump their engine design in the near future, because as I have mentioned, they were stuck with a ...... up design by hiring a monkey for their engineer, and soon move on to a completely different design or follow suit with other manufactures and admit their flaws.

I had a 2011 BMW S1000rr and by comparison, its a far better bike than the Panigale.

I found the 1299 overall easier to ride than my 899. It does rev a little quicker. But the slipper and e suspension help a lot. The akra and or a map can smooth out the low end. Not sure it will make you happy with it. I love mine 320 miles in 7 days in "......" SoCal weather. M
 
nope I've never been able to handle coaching this unruly beast in horrible conditions at speed on a race track using stock SP tires.. nope its just not able to be ridden with its crazy jerky throttle and ungodly torque..



 
yes, and don't forget about the random engine stalls. Mine happened on the ramp mid corner getting on the freeway. That must be a special feature of the Panigale too right? Is that something I have to learn to adapt to as well?
Thanks to those with positive encouragement and feedback. Unfortunately, I have made up my mind to not "just deal with it". Bike is going to be returned first thing tomorrow. There are far better bikes out there.

Instead of making the 1299 more powerful, Ducati should've worked on fixing the underlying issues I have mentioned in this thread. I bought the second generation of 1299 S, which is the 2016 model, and it still has stalling issues. In my book, this show nothing but a poor workmanship and irresponsibility. They know the issue is there, but choose to ignore it and still push the product out to consumers. This is unacceptable and I refuse to depend my life on it.
 
Last edited:
You've put an average of 50,000 miles on 30 bikes?:eek:
Pretty much. Some bikes more, some bikes less. I sold my previous 2009 Daytna wth 29,000 miles on it and that's the LEAST amount of miles I have ever put on any of my motorcycles. I put over 150,000 on my Suzuki TLS 1000 in 7 years. Bear in mind, I have been riding to work on a Motorcyle for 37 years now.. :eek:
 
Somebody buy this guy a drink quick before he has a heart attack.
The only problem i see is the loose nut behind the wheel.
 
You don't mention the heat on the legs ? Now there is a issue that is real. The throttle is same as most powerful twins. That's the character. But to call it unsafe ? And you clearly have saddle time ? Maybe yours is just a dud . Go test the demo again and compare .

Fwiw, I tested a 1190r ktm .Felt real good. After buying a new one, I found the gearbox engagement abrupt when going into gear. The heat from engine excessive.Went back and tested the demo again, same thing. I had missed it. A bit of homework, a good clutch bleed and it's better. Some extra heat shield s and less heat. Not gone , just better.

All said and done it's still suits me better than the GSA LC I owned for 8 months. And that had no issues, other than being boring and wide as a truck.

So here's the thing. And I hear your frustration. Is your 1299 faulty ? If not, do the good outweigh the bad ? Can you live with the flaws ?
Only you can answer these things.
Good luck.
 
I picked up a 2016 Panigale 1299 S a few weeks ago and finally had a chance to ride it on Sunday (I work 6 days a week and weather hasn't been all that great lately), and put about 40 miles on it.

Today I am sitting here contemplating on selling the stupid bike. And here is the reason why. While riding on the street like a normal human being, the bike simply doesn't work. Every turn I make on the street is a gamble with my life on this thing. Its nearly impossible to modulate the god damn throttle to make the POS turn smoothly without it bucking or surging, even in WET MODE with all the electronic aids turned on! What is the point of riding a bike that has such a huge learning curve and high risk factor? Sure, if you're a dare devil or an adrenaline junky, the story might be different. But I am not willing to take that kind of risk with my life. And having paid close to thirty thousand dollars for this ....... garbage, using it only for track seems like a huge waste, because I paid a hefty premium for those ridiculously unusable headlights, turn signals and mirrors. In every aspect, this bike is nothing more than a showoff piece.

Some people say this bike is an "angry machine". Well, currently I am angrier than it, because I bought into the hype. Last time I rode a Ducati was when they came out with 1198 with a big hype surrounding it just like they do with all of their new bikes. When I test rode it, I absolutely hated it. I just don't understand their logic and their concept of making gazillion ft.lbs of torque at low rpm range which cannot be predictably controlled. Ducati chose the wrong path with their engine concept. To me, it was a ...... up design from the start and they were stuck with it. So they had to patch it up as much as they possible could, wrap it up in pretty plastic covers and had their marketing team go to work.

And so many years later, they still carry on their stupid concept. It doesn't matter riders couldn't handle 60ft.lb of torque 5 years ago, ducati is going to make a 100ft.lb torque machine where riders only used 5% of its power on the pavement they ride 90% of the time. And they didn't care that the 80% of its power could not be properly managed on the street, because its a "race bike", "you have to be angry to ride it" (are you ....... promoting road rage?), "just ride it faster" (and kill yourself)?, get an aftermarket ECU modulator (which may not work) and pay another grand on top of what you already paid for the "most advanced bike in the world?" c'mon! Give me a break!

Ducatis arrogance is appalling. Their attitude is simply irresponsible and it clearly shows that Ducati as a company does not care about the safety of its consumers, but rather consider their customers to be a bunch of ....... with a death wish who will eventually Darwin themselves out using the crude tools they've provided.

I foresee that Ducati will dump their engine design in the near future, because as I have mentioned, they were stuck with a ...... up design by hiring a monkey for their engineer, and soon move on to a completely different design or follow suit with other manufactures and admit their flaws.

I had a 2011 BMW S1000rr and by comparison, its a far better bike than the Panigale.


Wow, I love this forum. When I first read this I thought this guy has a problem, but after reading it I felt like such a fool.

This was just a big wind up or gee up (joke post). This guy is just having fun I just missed the joke at first.

I mean really, could anyone really be this stupid. Hey Mr Nanoplastic, you really had me there for a minute. Silly me. Good one buddy.:D
 
Base on your past experiences and vast knowledge of the brand why would you have ever have test rode a 1299S let alone purchase one? I'll take it off of your hands tomorrow so you can enter the new year a happy man.
 
You don't mention the heat on the legs ? Now there is a issue that is real. The throttle is same as most powerful twins. That's the character. But to call it unsafe ? And you clearly have saddle time ? Maybe yours is just a dud . Go test the demo again and compare .

Fwiw, I tested a 1190r ktm .Felt real good. After buying a new one, I found the gearbox engagement abrupt when going into gear. The heat from engine excessive.Went back and tested the demo again, same thing. I had missed it. A bit of homework, a good clutch bleed and it's better. Some extra heat shield s and less heat. Not gone , just better.

All said and done it's still suits me better than the GSA LC I owned for 8 months. And that had no issues, other than being boring and wide as a truck.

So here's the thing. And I hear your frustration. Is your 1299 faulty ? If not, do the good outweigh the bad ? Can you live with the flaws ?
Only you can answer these things.
Good luck.

Super abrupt throttle response (even when I keep it steady, bike lurches back and forth) and random engine stalls make the bike UNPREDICTABLE, thus UNSAFE. Heat coming from the saddle, not so much. I guess you missed my point.
 
Ok…Enough of this " I guess you missed the point" line of nonsense..
Either articulate your "point" explicitly to us masses or GTFO…
 
Base on your past experiences and vast knowledge of the brand why would you have ever have test rode a 1299S let alone purchase one? I'll take it off of your hands tomorrow so you can enter the new year a happy man.

I purchased one for the same reason why people trade in their 1199 for 1299. Or buy an R or an S instead of a base model. I believed 1299s had significant improvements over the 1198. The main issue lies in its controllability. Power is nothing without control, right?

Now, is it that hard for some of you to accept the fact that I made a regrettable decision? Have you not made any mistakes similar to mine ever?

Think of it this way. If Ducati came out with a new bike that mimicked a throttle response of an inline 4 and still retained all of its strengths (such as power and torque), fixed the stalling and heat issues and called it a 1399, who here would say I like my bike just the way it is now, with all these inherent "problems" because that's the "characteristic" of the twin engine and these problems are what makes a Ducati a Ducati. This type of logic is simply ludicrous.
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread Closed

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions

Back
Top