@ the OP..
Like with most things in life, there are no absolutes. As such the answer to your question depends on many many things.
1. Do you have past experience with
* Trail bikes
* Cycling - Mountain,Road, Trials
- If you've had many years of experience cycling on the road, then your road skills will be the same. Mountain biking or trail bikes will have developed most of your bike handling skills. Albeit, the Pani will be heavier.
2. Mental maturity
- The right attitude will go a long way. If you have the basic attitude that you're invisible and it is your responsibility to avoid other road users, then this will prevent 99.9% of accidents.
Having the right attitude means that you are well aware of your abilities and thus be reluctant to push beyond them. Will also mean that you won't be doing traffic light GP at every chance, you will not be taking unnecessary risks etc etc.
3. Mechanical aptitude
- Having good mechanical aptitude means that you will be able to quickly understand how the bike works and all it's idiosyncrasies, allowing you to adapt to it.
IMO, the Pani doesn't seem all that much different to my Ninja 250, from a weight and size perspective. Perhaps a tad heavier.
Sure, there is ALOT more power at your disposal, but that's what the rotating barrel on the
right is for
I've jumped from a Ninja 250 to a GSXR 1000 (2002) . The Gixxer is one heavy beast compared to the Ninja250 and is much wider and heavier than the Pani as well..
Admittedly, I've never done a traffic light GP take off. I don't lane split and only filter if I've seen the lights go from green to red. I'm what you would call a "conservative" rider.
I've also had 15 years of experience cycling on Sydney roads and MTBing. I rarely if ever have spares after dismantling and repairing something.
DISCLAIMER: I'm still waiting for my Pani, so opinions are based off a play session I had a Frasers