One more time, my stance has NEVER changed. I don't know why you keep saying that ......... My stance, from the very beginning, is that you do NOT have to modulate the throttle...you hold the throttle wide open and the LC limits the RPMs, thus allowing you to concentrate on the lights/flag.
No, this is your stance from about half way through the discussion. Did you or did you not say in one of you first posts:
"The ONLY thing Launch Control does (on bikes that have it, which our Panigale does not) is limit the RPMs."
To which I pointed out that it is the torque which is controlled.
You then said: "No. it does not "control" the torque. It limits the RPM to the range where the most torque is made."
This bit makes no sense because if it were to output maximum torque you would be defeating the whole purpose of LC, but this is where the discussion started. You were completely wrong. From there on you just embarrassed yourself trying to dig your way out of a hole you created by being misinformed.
From there, you still have to find the engagement point, get a good reaction time, and modulate the CLUTCH, then shift into 2nd. That holds true on every single bike worldwide, with or without LC. Hence the quality of the launch ALWAYS comes down to the rider. Again, that holds true in ever level of racing, regardless of how sophisticated the LC system is. I don't understand how you cant grasp that. I have been saying the same .... throughout this entire thread, and others have agreed.
Yes, but that is all pretty obvious and not what we were discussing, these were all attempts by you to skew the discussion away from you initial wrong assumption.
You keep dodging my point regarding how even WSBK and MotoGP riders get poor launches, even with the advanced LC on their bikes. You dismiss it and talk about violins and .... because you don't want to admit that what I am saying is true. Launching the bike always comes down to the rider, with or without LC. Just this morning I watched a race where 2 riders, both on Aprilia's, had drastically different launches. One of them went from the 2nd row into the top 3 off the launch, the other one went from the first row down to 10th before entering T1. 2 riders, both on Aprilia's, both with LC, 2 drastically different results off the launch. Know why? Because one of them didn't modulate the clutch good enough, popped the front wheel up several times, and got a ...... launch.
Again you are avoiding the original point but since you have brought up WSBK and MotoGP I decided to see if I could find out a little bit about the ECUs in these competitions. I asked you if you knew what the control strategies were but you didn't know and didn't respond. Here are a couple of interesting articles on the MotoGP unified software, they have some long words in them but you probably have a dictionary.
A couple of very interesting points in these articles. One is that manufacturers are allowed to use any sensors they like and this leads to variations in software performance. The other is this quote which is more relevant to our discussion:
"Things are a little different for Aprilia. The Noale factory already has world-class electronics, developed in part in World Superbikes. The switch to the unified software was a step back for Aprilia, also because their MotoGP effort is being run with such limited resources."
So the MotoGP software is not as good as their own stuff which was developed "in part" from the Superbike stuff. So both your claims about MotoGP and WSBK launches are completely without foundation.
Also interesting is the bit about torque control.
https://motomatters.com/analysis/2015/09/08/everything_you_wanted_to_know_about_moto.html
2016 MotoGP Mid-Season Review: Spec Software
YOU were the one that said LC is indeed an "auto-holeshot" device. Which is flat wrong.
You introduced the term and I did say that it was, but I think later I did point out that we had not really defined the term and so it was probably not the best idea to use it. It is still more than not however.
Anyway, you are no longer entertaining. So let me just say this and end it.
Oh I don't know, I've enjoyed it and perhaps some others have gleaned something from our discussion.
You are the man. Your knowledge and ability with LC and launching is phenomenal, apparently better than anyone else, on any level. We will stand by and wait for you to post videos of you consistently dumping the clutch and beating the entire field into T1.
Well it's pretty easy if you know how to work the electronics (which is a couple of buttons), how hard can it be? I suggest you try to learn but old dog, new tricks?
I was going to suggest a video and I will post something since I now have a camera. I won't get to the strip until October but I may be able to do something on a back road somewhere.
Until such videos are posted, have a good day.
Yes, thanks. It's a pity, you haven't contributed one ounce of knowledge to this whole series of posts. Your original wrong statements were followed by you just trying to wriggle out of your own ignorance by skewing the discussion, changing you mind, and introducing yet more fallacious "facts". Really, if you could have admitted you had made a mistake right at the beginning you could have avoided all this humiliation. I asked you for information about the Rapidbike, MotoGP and WSBK LC strategies and you gave no information. I realise you don't know but I did give you the opportunity to at least try to find out.
At least you've learnt something and I do suggest you read those articles, I found them quite interesting.
Cheers