- Joined
- Jan 5, 2013
- Messages
- 37
- Location
- Florida
Any thought on removing the flapper valve?
Is there a significant increase in volume? Any downside?
Is there a significant increase in volume? Any downside?
Any thought on removing the flapper valve?
Is there a significant increase in volume? Any downside?
i also would like to ask sumone about this
i hear some have removed theres
but is there any pros or cons to this? besides louder exhaust.
would it ruin the starting or create smoke or bad for engine long
From what I've heard, it's only there for noise restrictions (they don't even have one with the termi setup). If you run your bike at about 4000rpm steady, you'l hear the exhaust flapper constantly opening and closing. The volume isn't considerably different, but I do find it's anoying and makes the bike buck a little. The cable can be disconnected on the left side of the bike between the exhaust cans (there are other threads with more info). If you just disconnect the cable, you will get a code, but it won't show up on the dash. Only your service tech will see it when hooking up the computer.
Any thought on removing the flapper valve?
Is there a significant increase in volume? Any downside?
Have you guys seen this?
Best slip on I've seen for the Pani yet.
Have you guys seen this?
Best slip on I've seen for the Pani yet.
Lets just put this on the record here... The CW pipe is the fugliest pipe out there... I am anything but a Termi stalwart (even though I have one) but the Termi looks sooooo much better than this ugly ass piece...
It is my understanding that the damn flapper valve must come off the bike, w cable and servo, if mounting any other exhaust. No need for it otherwise. No?
And screw that nasty CW slash cut thing! Lmao
With an aftermarket ( non Termi) you should at least disconnect the valve if not remove it complete, otherwise why having a slip-on that get's shocked down by a valve.
I don't think this forum has shown any proof the full Termi system offers better performance than the slipons, I think the opposite was shown by AR.