The 2020+ front frame has cutouts in it to allow for flex. ...
...I think that was close to when the 1199 went to the 1299. Its not a huge leap but a tick more.
View attachment 39369
Frame
Ouch two gaping holes! That hurts?
I also went silent in awe after learning from Claudio about this 'gaping' intervention to improve PV4's frontend feedback. I guess less=more? lol
Nevertheless the frontend feel of my '18 V4S feels fine and secure on the road and
track with still its 'intact' magnesium frontal frame.
Especially compared to my previous optimised Daytona 675 track-bike, which was known for its great chassis feedback.
I do remember VR46 struggling though with related frontend issues riding his MotoGP V4, so more flex could potentially improve frontend feel if you really push it on track.
I must say that soon after purchase, I had the front- and rear-suspension for both these bikes personally updated and dialled in by a
suspension specialist for my weight and usage.
Different internal shims, improved general geometry setup and custom spring/damper configuration again made a world of difference in handling.
Factory setup for both was OK, but both felt soo much more planted and refined - inspiring confidence - after this treatment. Best investment period.
Engine & Electronics
Even though I also had the
DTC/DQS recently updated to 'Evo2', which makes power management and shifting a tad smoother, I generally like the edgier 'balls to the wall' engine character of my 'original' PV4 better (closer to the even r-/tougher 1199/1299 'true Ducati' PV2 twins), compared to that of later and current more refined PV4's. That doesn't mean I consider the 2021 PV4 a boring bike, just a somewhat more polished character which makes it an evolutionary more refined and efficient 'easier2ridefast' tracktool.
Engine displacement and power is 99,9% the same, nothing like the difference between 1199 and 1299 displacement I recon. But I can't tell from personal experience, since never actually rode any of these older iconic PV2's.
Fairing
Shark gills in its side panels are both a great looking addition as well as providing
more efficient airflow for heat shedding.
I dislike the 'bloated' frontal silhouette which supposedly improves the wind protection. Which can also sufficiently be achieved by installing the higher up racing canopy.
IMHO I still truly love the much more refined look of the original 1199/1299 PV2's and succeeding PV4 upto 2019.
Nowadays bigger=better to show off its racing pedigree with even uglier 'aero' wings seems to be the mantra?
IMHO quite laughable for PV4's primarily ridden as street-bikes and primarily doing street-legal speeds?