I already have this function built into my right wrist. My system works on every bike I ride without additional "per bike" fees or other electronic difficulties.
I'd have to agree with Cloner....kinda.
Not that I don't see a useful function to it. But after a good 35+ yrs of riding, I don't see myself using it. I don't even use the existing DQS. I used clutchless (up)shifting on my race bikes. But they were 2-strokes and GP pattern. The "blip-while-you-clutch in-brake-n-downshift" is so ingrained in me by now and such an automatic action any clutchless electronics that did it for me would be wasted.
I'll draw the line on that one. I think paddle shifters are the worst thing to happen to sports cars in just about ever. Losing the mechanical connection to the drivetrain simply sucks, IMHO. F1 reversed a lot of driver "aids" like launch control and TC several years ago which was immediately successful to the sport with fans and drivers alike, but missed the opportunity to eradicate the scourge of "flappy paddle gearboxes."
If you lived through or even watched videos of the awesome 80's-90's F1 era, where fantastic talents like Prost, Mansell and Senna battled it out with analogue machines, you would wish the same. Shifting yourself was part of the skill set: you missed a shift - you got passed
Exactly my point, Charlie. Good habits are hard to break. I guess I need a Bonneville.
I'd have to agree with Cloner....kinda.
Not that I don't see a useful function to it. But after a good 35+ yrs of riding, I don't see myself using it. I don't even use the existing DQS. I used clutchless (up)shifting on my race bikes. But they were 2-strokes and GP pattern. The "blip-while-you-clutch in-brake-n-downshift" is so ingrained in me by now and such an automatic action any clutchless electronics that did it for me would be wasted.
Exactly my point, Charlie. Good habits are hard to break. I guess I need a Bonneville.
I see the value in these new technologies, but the best implementations (at least in the car world) have it so that the driver/rider can choose to have them on or off.
Personally, on a track day where I'm chasing lap times and want to increase safety by eliminating the occasional human mistake of not getting a rev-matched downshift correct and resulting rear slide, I would want the clutchless rev-matched down shift feature. It leaves more bandwidth for focusing on at-limit trail braking and other critical tasks, and ostensibly allows you to brake even later.
These same advantages on the track do add even more safety on the street. But when I'm feeling old-school and want to exercise my hard-won skills from years of practice, I definitely want to be able to turn it off.
AND, it should be banned from racing to emphasize the individual skill and increase the spectacle!!!!
I'm interested in the race version! A grand is pricey.
Don't the Moto GP guys still use the clutch? I see them modulating its release on corner entries. Just wondering. When the camera goes to the rear pendgelum camera you can hear them downshifting and it sounds no blipping is done. Never a pro racer here so just wondering what they do? Or even WSBK for that matter?
I can still use the clutch with my downshift blipper with no ill effects, it still blips for me even when I pull the clutch in, as soon as I press the shift lever. So I don't see any downside from that perspective, if you have a particular corner where you want to ease in the rear wheel drag manually with the clutch, you can sure do it and still enjoy the benefit of being smoother with the brakes by not having to blip the throttle.
I have the tune boy setup and the total cost was just about $1000.00 including the strain gauge for auto blipper function.
Have the tune boy prices changed that much ?
TuneBoy - Engine Management SystemsFrom where?? Just the strain gauge is $1057 and the Tuneboy reflash key and labor for reflash is $505 from Boulder Motorsports.