For Sale Oakley Ducati Corse Limited Edition Sunglasses

Bought these a couple years ago before I even had a Ducati (been a fan that long!). They've been worn only a couple times, as I've got other sunglasses and wanted to keep these pristine, and are still in mint condition. They're so nice and rare now I don't want to wear them, so I'm selling them here.
Comes with everything shown - original box, documentation, extra nosepieces and microfiber case. There was a guy with a similar set on eBay and he wanted $600 for them, which is flat ridiculous. Had these on eBay and an idiot non-paying bidder won them, now I don't want to re-list them. Now reduced to $225!(net of Paypal fees) gets them shipped within the 48 contiguous US states, and actual shipping cost if you live outside of this area.

As always, great detailed photos Jeff !

Bumpity

too expensivty

Trauma said:

too expensivty

Click to expand...

Duh, make me an offery!

Ok, these are gathering dust in a drawer and need to be worn by a true Ducatista. Now on sale for $225 shipped!

JeffD said:

Ok, these are gathering dust in a drawer and need to be worn by a true Ducatista. Now on sale for $225 shipped!

Click to expand...

$129ery, what I pay for my Raybans

JeffD said:

Comparing Made-in-USA with superior optics/ergonomics, officially-licensed Ducati Corse Limited Edition Oakley's with Rayban's that are exactly the same Chinese POS that fat, drugged-out John Belushi and un-funny Dan Akroyd made famous in an 80's movie? Heresy!

Click to expand...

Uh, I own the Aviators, for flying lol...

Trauma said:

Uh, I own the Aviators, for flying lol...

Click to expand...

Speaking of that, did you ever read the 2003 test that Private Pilot magazine published on 65 different sunglasses to measure optical performance? They had an independent testing lab perform ANSI Z87.1 tests to measure Prismatic Power, Refractive Power, Prismatic Imbalance, Astigmatism and Definition.

Spoiler alert: Oakley won both non-polarized and polarized categories (of course) and Ray Ban finished third and sixth, respectively:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByldYbWwjAf4b3NpZm5IMGhTQzA/edit

JeffD said:

Speaking of that, did you ever read the 2003 test that Private Pilot magazine published on 65 different sunglasses to measure optical performance? They had an independent testing lab perform ANSI Z87.1 tests to measure Prismatic Power, Refractive Power, Prismatic Imbalance, Astigmatism and Definition.

Spoiler alert: Oakley won both non-polarized and polarized categories (of course) and Ray Ban finished third and sixth, respectively:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByldYbWwjAf4b3NpZm5IMGhTQzA/edit

Click to expand...

No offense, but I am going to use my eyes to decide what gives me the best vision up there, not the internet For instance, polarized sometimes hide the instrument readings. I use Serengeti Aviators on cloudy days, they give better definition. Oakleys I use for Jetsking.