LOL what??? You totally twisted this article then just made up your own ending.
Clearly Ducati is a disaster that nobody can ride competitively. If one or two people were successful then you might have a reason to blame the others, but no one was (with the sole exception of Casey Stoner who was riding a completely different bike on different tires). If you give them all pedal bikes I'm sure you'll have the same results - no one stands out.
But who stood out above the rest between 2002 and 2009??
"yeah but he had the best equipment!"
Honda is far and away the dominant manufacturer for the last 20 years, winning 12 of them. Arguably the ONLY reason they didn't win 4 more of those was because Rossi decided to jump off the Honda (the "best equipment") and onto a Yamaha, and school them 4 times in 7 years! Sounds pretty special to me.
If you don't think 46 is anything special, there are 9 championships, skyrocketing TV ratings, billions of dollars, and one of the largest fan clubs in the world that begs to disagree.
A rider isn't the only factor into his success, the equipment and chief mechanic/set up play huge roles, and success is determined by all three of those variables. History shows we have every reason to believe that Valentino Rossi does a very good job at fulfilling the riders roll compared to pretty much everyone else. If Hayden, Dovi, Spies or Cal have huge success on the same bike then we may have reason to doubt it, but so far not so much.
You can dislike Rossi all u want, but please don't deny how special of a rider he has proven to be in his career and to the sport. I'm not a huge fan of Jorge, but I can easily admit he is one of the most talented and unique riders out there without ever cheering for him.