Trail Question

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

I wasn't shooting for a specific trail number, I just needed my bike to finish the corners better on the gas. And I was also rubbing my front tire on the radiator shroud under braking at turn 14 of Thunderhill resulting in the rear tire dancing and coming up too much. So I was solving multiple problems when I did all those mods.

yep me too....exact same conclusion and changes!

But as us amateurs some cynics would question can we really feel these millimetre differences...
 
What trail figure did you ultimately arrive at? And was this for a V4?

I didn't calculate it because I don't have a chassis program, and I don't know how to do it other than that way. I was going on feel rather than numbers because there's no real info out there to compare to. I'm happy with the results though, now I need to dial in the rear. The bike is a 959.
 
I didn't calculate it because I don't have a chassis program, and I don't know how to do it other than that way. I was going on feel rather than numbers because there's no real info out there to compare to. I'm happy with the results though, now I need to dial in the rear. The bike is a 959.

I’ve think I’ve seen you up there. T-hill A group is no joke (no matter the org running it). I’ll gladly and humbly stay in my B group. I struggled around that track again with having to wrestle the bike to get it to lean over.

This simple spreadsheet calculator would be a good start if you want to know.

https://www.datamc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/rake_trail_calculator_v3-0.xls
 
That calculator says 103.6 Trail, 94.2 Normal Trail. But that doesn't calculate where my forks are in the triples which changes trail.
 
That calculator says 103.6 Trail, 94.2 Normal Trail. But that doesn't calculate where my forks are in the triples which changes trail.

Not necessarily. Depends on who you talk to. Adjusting fork length will affect rake relative to stock position. I’d assume stock position I had 8-10 mm fork (5 mm anodized) exposed. Move the forks to flush with triple increases fork length and therefore rake which then increases trail.

I’m also assuming that all these figures are determined with no sag factored in.
 
Not necessarily. Depends on who you talk to. Adjusting fork length will affect rake relative to stock position. I’d assume stock position I had 8-10 mm fork (5 mm anodized) exposed. Move the forks to flush with triple increases fork length and therefore rake which then increases trail.

I’m also assuming that all these figures are determined with no sag factored in.

Honestly because I have aftermarket triples that are thicker that stock, I have no idea where the forks are compared to stock. For all I know flush on the top triple could be the same as 5mm showing with the stock triples.
 
Honestly because I have aftermarket triples that are thicker that stock, I have no idea where the forks are compared to stock. For all I know flush on the top triple could be the same as 5mm showing with the stock triples.

I also used this calculator to verify that spreadsheet one. It’s kind of a pain bc you have to convert measurements. If I remember correctly they were within 0.1 mm of each other.

https://www.rbracing-rsr.com/rakeandtrail.html
 
yep me too....exact same conclusion and changes!

But as us amateurs some cynics would question can we really feel these millimetre differences...

What I think is your change may be too subtle for them. I know you must have run the bike at some point with the front dropped to give you the 24 degree head and the associated trail. But instead you made bushings, which pretty much leave the CG and ant-squat alone. I'm thinking that wasn't by accident. I actually think your set-up would be good for SD as he's light so his bikes CG is lower to begin with and goes lower dropping the front. Ducati moved the CG up at the 22 (?) revision for a reason.
 
What I think is your change may be too subtle for them. I know you must have run the bike at some point with the front dropped to give you the 24 degree head and the associated trail. But instead you made bushings, which pretty much leave the CG and ant-squat alone. I'm thinking that wasn't by accident. I actually think your set-up would be good for SD as he's light so his bikes CG is lower to begin with and goes lower dropping the front. Ducati moved the CG up at the 22 (?) revision for a reason.

If you compare the steering head bushings of the 959/1299 to the V2, you'll see they pushed out the steering stem of the V2 like my +-10mm Corsa bushings. How much I don't know, but the V2 has two different part numbers for the bushings. And the 959/1299 have the same for both.
 
Last edited:
959 vs V2 steering bushings
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241021_135925_Gmail.jpg
    Screenshot_20241021_135925_Gmail.jpg
    218.6 KB
  • Screenshot_20241021_135854_Gmail.jpg
    Screenshot_20241021_135854_Gmail.jpg
    121.9 KB

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.
Back
Top