You 2015 "R" owners have a weapon on your hands..

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

the whole reason I have traded my 14R in is because I think it was a far better race bike than street bike because it only really came alive in the higher RPM (8-9,000 rpm plus) and was some what lifeless and did not like the lower rpm ranges which you more often than not see on the street going around and accelerating out of corners etc.

Any model 1299 will trounce an 1199 (pre '15) in the midrange - this thing is an f'n monster and as far from "lifeless" in the midrange as you can get

What's the S price down under?
 
Last edited:
This is bad....... Nick at Rockwell has an R on the floor and now I'm waiting to hear back.

I have to say that there are quite a few SLs floating around now. pricing in the 50s. Is the SL not worth the extra cash? You guys decide. I'm inclined to thing it is, ut want to hear your thoughts.

Thanks.
 
The SL is worth the extra . My current 1199R is pretty much current spec so will be interesting to ride my 1299 back to back with the other bike .
 
While Chaz was having fun turning laps on the '15 R, a slower rider on a slower bike was lapping Misano.

DJY2lrA.jpg


:D
 
1299S retails for A$37 on the road for 12 months. 15R is close enough to A$48 on road for 12 months - this is full pricing, no discount.

I know the 1299 will walk over the 14 1199s, including my 14R, but what about the 15R, that is what I am trying to work out. I am not after the quickest bike on a track, I am after the better street bike and to me the extra torque lower down in the rev range the 1299 has over even the 15R (I beleive) indicates the 1299 should be better suited
 
1299S retails for A$37 on the road for 12 months. 15R is close enough to A$48 on road for 12 months - this is full pricing, no discount.

I know the 1299 will walk over the 14 1199s, including my 14R, but what about the 15R, that is what I am trying to work out. I am not after the quickest bike on a track, I am after the better street bike and to me the extra torque lower down in the rev range the 1299 has over even the 15R (I beleive) indicates the 1299 should be better suited

Answered your own question .
 
The SL is worth the extra . My current 1199R is pretty much current spec so will be interesting to ride my 1299 back to back with the other bike .

I would love to hear your thoughts. Did you get a base?
 
Forgot to mention....

The difference between the 2014 R and the new R is night and day. The engine is where a huge difference is. I can't believe this engine. SL owners have had this tucked away for a while, honestly, nothing will touch it.

The handling is the other, the set up is sublime. Such small changes have made such big differences.

If you were wanting an R, but didn't know which one to get, I suggest you get the R, especially if you had last years R, you need this bike.
 
True enough, but there has to be a cut off where it costs as much to upgrade as it would change parts.

Did you swap out the pistons, heads and internals etc. on your old R?

Seriously though, the difference is massive, streets ahead. The gears are endless, 3rd is where it all really kicks off and how quickly it spools up is awesome.
 
Yes I have upgraded to SL Pistons SL cams SL inlet titanium valves which the 15 does not have I don't believe and the 24 degree head angle swap .
The difference from before is very noticeable .im glad the new bike has these changes it is certainly worth it .
 
Hey wilks,
Can you post part numbers so I can order and have them sent out. Thanks!
 
Mutt1979, have you ridden a 1299 yet? if so, can you give us your thoughts on comparison between that and your R.

My ordered S is due to arrive tomorrow, so by the time the dealer fits the Akra Evo system and other carbon bits and pieces and resprings the front and rear it will be a week. They are more than happy for me to change over onto an R (I just traded my 14R in) if I wish, but I need to make a decision now and I am just so torn - the whole reason I have traded my 14R in is because I think it was a far better race bike than street bike because it only really came alive in the higher RPM (8-9,000 rpm plus) and was some what lifeless and did not like the lower rpm ranges which you more often than not see on the street going around and accelerating out of corners etc.

I wish I could ride both before making a decision but that will never happen as Ducati Australia will not have demos until at least December.....

G'day buttnekid, I know you're after some real world comparison and I can't provide that, but I also know you're up against a deadline to make your choice. I went through the same dilemma ref choosing between the 1299 S or Panigale R (2015). I ended up choosing the 1299 S (so I'm already biased ;), but I thought I'd share with you my analysis of the power curves. I know, I know, power curves are not as important as some believe them to be, and a person's perception of power delivery is also affected by lots of things (speed, acceleration, noise, etc.), but when you're sitting at the bottom of the world waiting for a bike there's sometimes not much else to go on.

All figures I've used are based on Ducati published data (so I assume there is reasonable relative consistency), but I had to use some "licence" at very near redline because of lacking data. And I'm including 1199 and 1199 R figures here for the potential interest of others. I'm not going to complicate things with analysis of weight difference of the bikes.

So, the 1st curve comparison is Power vs RPM for 1199, 1199 R, 1299 and Panigale R (2015). It's immediately obvious that the 1299 makes more power at lower RPM. This is the curve that most people look at, but it doesn't tell the whole story and TBH I don't pay much attention to it (the curve of Torque vs RPM is even less relevant IMHO).

The 2nd curve comparison is Power vs % RPM for 1199, 1199 R, 1299 and Panigale R (2015). The % RPM values are normalised to each bike engine's redline RPM. I won't comment on this one either. Instead, I'll split it into 2 sections: one for the higher RPM band and one for the lower.

The 3rd curve comparison is the same as the 2nd except that it's only looking at % RPM above ~65%. Why? Because, all the Panigales have the same relative gear ratios and the largest % change in ratio is 31.6%(between 1st and 2nd gears). So, changing gear at near redline in 1st gear will drop the engine speed back to ~65% of redline RPM. So, this curve shows the relative power of each bike when ridden hard and well. It clearly shows the advantage that the Panigale R (2015) should have on the track (noting that this curve ignores start line launch).

The 4th curve comparison is the same as the 2nd/3rd except that it shows % RPM below ~65%. Why? Because, for street riding you can often find yourself in the "wrong gear" (for various reasons), and for a lot of folk there is some reluctance to click down the gears to get the engine into its proper operating zone prior to accelerating. Instead, there's a tendency to just apply WOT and wait (impatiently). This curve shows some advantage for the 1299 when operating outside of the engine's proper operating zone.

The 5th curve comparison shows Power vs Bike Speed, with the speed normalised with respect to the Panigale R (2015). So, this curve shows the power for any speed and chosen gear combination, and it also takes account of different final drive ratios of the various bikes (15/39 for the 1199 and 1299, and 15/41 for the 1199 R and Panigale R (2015)). It really tells the story of the typical roll-on comparison scenario (for those interested in that kinda thing), and since bike speed when initially applying WOT is often determined by the previous corner (and that would be relatively similar for all these bikes) this curve can be used to say something about relative acceleration out of a given corner. What's most obvious here is that 1299 holds some advantage from 30% to 60%, then there's not much difference between 1199 R, 1299 and Panigale R (2015) from 60% to 70%, from 70% to 90% it's line-ball between 1299 and Panigale R (2015), and above 90% it's Panigale R (2015) all the way.

Buttnekid, as I said, I ended up choosing the 1299 S, but I hope you might get something out of all that.

P.S. As I re-read the above I realize I'm going stir-crazy waiting here these final few days - apologies for the above to anyone who is actually riding/enjoying their bike.
 

Attachments

  • Chart 1.pdf
    81.3 KB
  • Chart2.pdf
    79.6 KB
  • Chart 3.pdf
    80 KB
  • Chart 4.pdf
    81.1 KB
  • Chart 5.pdf
    79.7 KB
Here you go Thamer
SL pistons x 2 12022261B

SL cams 14814361C
14814381B
Exh valves x4 21110821A

The heads need to be modified to take the SL Pistons and the shims and hardware for the titanium valves need to be purchased they are different to the steel
 
Of course lets not forget all these graphs, power figures and Chaz's laps are all irrelevant as soon as the slightly over weight middle aged guy with limited ability throws his leg over a 15R

So to 99% of buyers its just bragging rights
 
Thanks a bunch! It seems I may have to wait till the end of 2015 and ship the engine out to the U.S. for this to be done. Don't know if we anyone out here that I would trust to do this.

I hate to think how long this might take
 

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions

Back
Top