Cheers mate, I love Cadwell. I just put a few new ones and vids from a couple weeks ago up:
http://ducati1299.com/racing/102-race-pics-about-you-24.html
I take it you have DWC off?
Cheers mate, I love Cadwell. I just put a few new ones and vids from a couple weeks ago up:
http://ducati1299.com/racing/102-race-pics-about-you-24.html
?? 90db days? I thought Laguna Seca always have that limit. Which days do they not?
Cheers mate, I love Cadwell. I just put a few new ones and vids from a couple weeks ago up:
http://ducati1299.com/racing/102-race-pics-about-you-24.html
I take it you have DWC off?
As an extra comment for track, I have recently been black flagged for noise with a totally standard R, yet guys with race systems and high flow filters etc on S bikes were getting no hassle at all.
I was hoping that buying the R would mitigate all the "extra" exhaust spends etc but it appears I am still going to have to mess about with pipes and tuning etc if I want to keep running at our local trackdays (105db ride by limit).
Also, using examples of various people who have blown up engines on the track is pretty much worthless for comparing engines. How the rider treats the engine has way more of an impact on the longevity than exactly which engine it is. In over 10 years of doing 25+ track days every year on Ducati Superbikes I have never blown an engine on one, with the exception of a 749R that had a crank snap in half due to a casting flaw (not rider induced). And I've had all manner of standard and R engines during that time. Yet I know other people I ride with who have gone through MULTIPLE engines during that same time. They almost always blame the engine, Ducati, the builder of the engine, the oil they ran, their zodiac sign, anything other than how they rode the bike. I chalk the difference up to the fact that I ride smoothly and in a way that I won't be bouncing off the rev limiter, and equally important that I won't be over-revving on downshifts. If you short-shift your Ducati and ride it like it was intended to be ridden (i.e. not like a 4-cyl) you stand a very strong chance of it lasting a good long time on the track, and it won't matter if it's an R or standard engine.
Also, using examples of various people who have blown up engines on the track is pretty much worthless for comparing engines. How the rider treats the engine has way more of an impact on the longevity than exactly which engine it is. In over 10 years of doing 25+ track days every year on Ducati Superbikes I have never blown an engine on one, with the exception of a 749R that had a crank snap in half due to a casting flaw (not rider induced). And I've had all manner of standard and R engines during that time. Yet I know other people I ride with who have gone through MULTIPLE engines during that same time. They almost always blame the engine, Ducati, the builder of the engine, the oil they ran, their zodiac sign, anything other than how they rode the bike. I chalk the difference up to the fact that I ride smoothly and in a way that I won't be bouncing off the rev limiter, and equally important that I won't be over-revving on downshifts. If you short-shift your Ducati and ride it like it was intended to be ridden (i.e. not like a 4-cyl) you stand a very strong chance of it lasting a good long time on the track, and it won't matter if it's an R or standard engine.
Also, using examples of various people who have blown up engines on the track is pretty much worthless for comparing engines. How the rider treats the engine has way more of an impact on the longevity than exactly which engine it is. In over 10 years of doing 25+ track days every year on Ducati Superbikes I have never blown an engine on one, with the exception of a 749R that had a crank snap in half due to a casting flaw (not rider induced). And I've had all manner of standard and R engines during that time. Yet I know other people I ride with who have gone through MULTIPLE engines during that same time. They almost always blame the engine, Ducati, the builder of the engine, the oil they ran, their zodiac sign, anything other than how they rode the bike. I chalk the difference up to the fact that I ride smoothly and in a way that I won't be bouncing off the rev limiter, and equally important that I won't be over-revving on downshifts. If you short-shift your Ducati and ride it like it was intended to be ridden (i.e. not like a 4-cyl) you stand a very strong chance of it lasting a good long time on the track, and it won't matter if it's an R or standard engine.
While on the subject, everyone needs to be aware that the rev limiter does NOT work on downshifts. If you are near redline and downshift, you WILL over-rev the motor. Do that too many times and you will blow your .... up.
What's your opinion on hard downshifting without getting too close to rev limiter? The compression sound on this engine is too good.
While on the subject, everyone needs to be aware that the rev limiter does NOT work on downshifts. If you are near redline and downshift, you WILL over-rev the motor. Do that too many times and you will blow your .... up.
I did not know this. Thanks, Chris.