95nm rear spring, YES!

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

Joined
Nov 13, 2020
Messages
450
Location
Raleigh NC
Finally got around to swapping the stock 85 rear spring to a 95 while I had the shock out for an oil change. This is a must if you are my weight (180 lbs). Transformed the driveability and performance of the rear end greatly. Much more stable and controlled for my weight. I didn’t think it would feel this different but i couldn’t be happier. Can’t wait to hit the track this weekend, I’m hoping the added stability (and added confidence) gets my past where I’ve been holding back. The problem I’ve had on track is corner exit. The rear would plant too much and the transition out would cause disruption in the rear so I would tend to not come out as hard as I’d like. Based off the spirited ride I took on a twisty road it is much improved now. Was on the gas earlier and harder post apex.

1. installed preload 11mm
2. Eye to eye 314mm
3. Sag: 20 rider, 8 static
 
Last edited:
Finally got around to swapping the stock 85 rear spring to a 95 while I had the shock out for an oil change. This is a must if you are my weight (180 lbs). Transformed the driveability and performance of the rear end greatly. Much more stable and controlled for my weight. I didn’t think it would feel this different but i couldn’t be happier. Can’t wait to hit the track this weekend, I’m hoping the added stability (and added confidence) gets my past where I’ve been holding back.

1. installed preload 11mm
2. Eye to eye 314mm
3. Sag: 20 rider, 8 static
Good info. Are you 180 with the gear?
 
Cool thanks. I think I have 100. It’s a short spring on the Desmo shock. Wondering how different it is or at all from the standard length spring same rate. I’m 210 without pads. The Mupo shock came with a 90. It looks to be the same dims as the Ohlins spring. Wondering if I can use the Ohlins spring. Lot easier than hunting down a Mupo spring.
 
Need to figure this out. Suspension setup is not in my wheelhouse.
 

Attachments

  • 39877F64-092B-47AD-8BC1-C4148FE19149.jpeg
    39877F64-092B-47AD-8BC1-C4148FE19149.jpeg
    92.5 KB
Need to figure this out. Suspension setup is not in my wheelhouse.

I would try to find the mupo spring instead of trying to go down the ohlins spring route. Too many variables to deal with. Doesn’t Omaha sell mupo stuff?
 
I would try to find the mupo spring instead of trying to go down the ohlins spring route. Too many variables to deal with. Doesn’t Omaha sell mupo stuff?
Yea probably a safer bet. I got the whole kit (forks, damper, shock and triple) from Mupo through a distributor. I will try Omaha. Thanks
 
Year of bike?

There was a linkage change 2020+, just so everyone is apples to apples.
I’m using the Desmo SBK link.
 

Attachments

  • 5DF439DB-166C-4089-ABA0-323337FFE5CE.jpeg
    5DF439DB-166C-4089-ABA0-323337FFE5CE.jpeg
    57.3 KB
  • 9D673659-59CB-4E1C-BFC4-3EAD3DCF8286.jpeg
    9D673659-59CB-4E1C-BFC4-3EAD3DCF8286.jpeg
    51.8 KB
  • 34079E97-B0BC-4835-A63C-AD180410F9BD.jpeg
    34079E97-B0BC-4835-A63C-AD180410F9BD.jpeg
    53.9 KB
I wonder what weight the stock 85 N/mm spring is suited for. At 180 lbs / 82 kg I should think you were close to the "average" rider. I'm 230 lbs / 105 kg in my birthday suit so no chance with stock springs for me! I went 105 N/mm in the rear, and my experience with the stiffer spring was basically exactly as you described.
 
The stock spring rate ist for rider with gear: 80 – 90 kg (176.36 – 198.42 lb)
And I’m sure that’s just fine for normal riding. I didn’t have any problems with my stock 85 spring riding on the road or when I wasn’t running as fast on track (not that I’m even fast now). At my pace on the track the rear is unstable and slowing me down.

Recommended weights are just that, recommendations. There are variables that come into play.
 
So I’m 235 lbs in my birthday suit, probably 255 lbs geared up. Do I need a 105 spring? 2012 1199S with Ohlins TTX
Greg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Recommended weights are just that, recommendations. There are variables that come into play.
one of these is happiness, maybe the most important.
you can change to the most recommended, make everything right with sag and so on...
awaiting great things...and the .... slows you down and let you alone with a big wtf.
i had a lot of fun with a too weak spring, wheel was acting of cause but never unstable, bouncing, bottoming(ok some times it has) etc.
now with a 14% harder spring(racetech recommendation) i have a complete new bike, the feeling is...not the same as before, i hope i learn how to use it.
when i ask myself, what was the Problem with the softer spring, i have no real answer.
 
one of these is happiness, maybe the most important.
you can change to the most recommended, make everything right with sag and so on...
awaiting great things...and the .... slows you down and let you alone with a big wtf.
i had a lot of fun with a too weak spring, wheel was acting of cause but never unstable, bouncing, bottoming(ok some times it has) etc.
now with a 14% harder spring(racetech recommendation) i have a complete new bike, the feeling is...not the same as before, i hope i learn how to use it.
when i ask myself, what was the Problem with the softer spring, i have no real answer.

But it’s not a subjective idea. The spring should allow the full range of desired motion.

You mentioned never unstable, bouncing and bottoming all in the same sentence. That doesn’t make sense, even though bouncing is a consequence of damping and not the spring.

The subjective issue is what the recommendations are actually for. There’s a lot of variables at play here… application (track/road), speed, style to account for; therefore it’s my opinion that the question should be who is recommending and for what.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions

Back
Top