- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,408
- Location
- California
Scrappy - I have to keep telling everybody knocking the mag/alum does not make the CFs look any better. And hello, what you just said is on the internet. So we shouldn't believe that either?
Most people (including me) don't like CF wheels because of the look. And BTW, CF is not "new" technology at all, so those compares are not very relavant - not to mention none them are something you are depending on at 150+ miles an hour. And as far as a plane wing, much happier my wings are aluminum rather than CF.
This is one of those topics/threeads that will not change people's opinions no matter how many post, or their cointent. Others?
Matte/Gloss
Red/White
R worth it
Base/S/Tri best bargain
Not trying to make a case but just asking people to educate themselves before making a decision based on facts. Whether its statics, physics/chemistry property facts. People don't have to believe my post because its the Internet, but it will give them a place/base to start researching before they make a decision. This thread has already second guess people who were wanting to put CF wheels on based on unfounded facts and In my opinion knocking the magnesium wheel does make a better case for CF. Because people who buy magnesium wheels should know the truth about magnesium and why manufacturer won't approve it for street use. Steering young guys into buying something that the manufacture won't even approve for street use and doing 150 MPH is just plane wrong! Won't you agree?
P.S. CF is newer technology than steel, aluminum or magnesium
Last edited: