So, what you are saying is that you CAN blip ?Yep...I can't not blip.
So, what you are saying is that you CAN blip ?
Agreed.
The bike has no business down or below 3k RPM.
And why would anyone need to blip the throttle at idle? Unless they are just trying to make the bike sound cool at a red light.
Agreed.
I have experienced the same things on pretty much every sportbike, even my highly tuned R6 Superbike.
These bikes are simply not meant to operate way down in the RPM's like that. The fueling is off.
I've happily eliminated the free-play with the throttle spacer fix; and there's still a small dead-zone where revs don't move after throttle is turned - which I'm expecting/hoping will get fixed when I ask the service centre to reset the TPS at first service.
But, my throttle is really laggy! Here's an example: blip the throttle when completed stopped in neutral (or clutch pulled in, in 1st gear) at idle... Let's say you blip to about 3000rpm. Now try doing the same thing when the bike is moving at walking pace (clutch pulled in, 1st gear, blip throttle). For the same amount of throttle movement the bike doesn't rev nearly as much (maybe not at all in fact or perhaps up to 2000rpm) and sometimes there's a delay before the revs start increasing.
Occasionally the throttle does respond quickly when moving, and causes me to over-rev when changing gears at slow speeds.
This is liveable if I'm just pottering around town like a grandmother, but makes it impossible to ride in any quick fashion... E.g. Taking off from a set of lights requires turning the throttle then waiting to see if the revs move... If not turn throttle a bit more; ease clutch out, etc. I'm slower than cars now at taking off from a set of lights. I've never had a bike with an inconsistent annoying throttle like this; and anyone watching would think I'm a learner rider. I am used to instant throttle response that allows for fast launches, not diesel 4wd throttle response.
Anyone else experience this behaviour and can it be fixed ? Wondering if this is a side affect of the closed loop O2 monitoring or some feature of the Ecu to change throttle response depending on if moving or stationary or something else ?
I just did a blip test... clutch in N, clutch out N, clutch in 1st. I really didn't notice much of a difference...pretty instant all the time.
Welcome to all the electronics! I hate all the limitations. I looked real close at the 1299 but chose to buy a 1198 because it has way less electronic crap on it. I like all the power, not kill it with all the modes and traction control. My 1198 has a quickshifter which is on and traction control which is turned off. The electronic crap may make it easier and faster on the track but way less fun on the street. Wheelie control???? That's crap. I like packing the front wheel 3 foot high at 100 plus mph. Its almost like they build a fast bike and then put limitations so beginners won't get on the bike and kill themselves?
I also had a 2014 KTM superduke. I paid a bunch for all the stupid electronic crap. I then had to spend more on a offroad dongle to disable all the stuff that makes it slow.
Update: the bike has different throttle mappings for each gear and different for neutral; so clutch in vs clutch out causes ecu to switch throttle mappings (to neutral with clutch in).
The fix is to update the throttle map to be the same for all gears and same for neutral: some ECU reprogramming software can do this (and some change gears but not neutral).
Let me know if you want some throttle mapping numbers as a starting point. (Note this is throttle mapping not fuel mapping).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
EVR clutch, Barnett discs, EVR basket Oberon slave, Brembo 18x16MC. Bulletproof. Thing launches like a marble from a slingshot. Never once stalled this thing from a light regardless how aggressive or non aggressive the launch and I am for lack of a better description, a fairly low skilled rider by anyones standards.