Is he racing a Pani somewhere that I don't know about? Is he still racing period, or is he just a hired rider for mags now?What about Hodgson.
Is he racing a Pani somewhere that I don't know about? Is he still racing period, or is he just a hired rider for mags now?What about Hodgson.
.......There's not a single review anywhere that I've been able to find, be-it print or video where the 1199 comes out on top of the open-class of sport bikes- not a single one!!!!!
Like the song says, "Don't believe the hype!"
(and yes I own one and do like it- but it's not leagues better than the 1198 it replaces despite the "Checkmate" campaign Ducati released.....it's a side-step upgrade with certain aspects worse!
Is he racing a Pani somewhere that I don't know about? Is he still racing period, or is he just a hired rider for mags now?
Good comments but handling issues, on both road and track, do seem to be an issue for some testers - maybe it is down to the riders and not the bike (so much). But the lap times don't lie - do they?
What I don't understand is how the "first ride" type reviews were all so positive and now, they are less so. For example, words like "epic" (UK Bike magazine) were being used. Was it because people were just comparing the Pani to the 1198, in the absence of the other superbikes? Was it the technology that was so dazzling? I don't know but it is just confusing.
Ultimately, I suppose reviews are opinions and can only be a guide: you pays your money and makes your choice, but in the end it's what YOU want and like that counts.
I find it interesting that these journalist say things like "The BMW is the bike I would chose if I was going racing". "It's the easiest bike to go fast on..." blah blah blah. Then you look at primer racing series world wide and they're basically no where to be found. In WSB BMW just won their first two races in 4 years. Is there even a KTM on the WSBK grid? Check AMA Superbike; Pegrim rides the only BMW that I know of? I think there're 2 KTM's (grid fillers). When Pegrim was riding the Ducati he was at the front challenging for wins and podiums. Now it's a good day when he finishes in the top 10. Most of the field are still riding Gixxers. I would think that if the BMW was so easy to ride fast and race (or KTM for that matter) the grid fillers would be on them? Exactly where are these bikes dominating? Someone please find me a series where this is happening?
Adam Waheed (33-years-old) - 6'0", 180 pounds - BMW (racing) / Yamaha (trackdays)
If I was going road racing I'd do it aboard a BMW. It would cost the least amount of money to turn into a road racer. Even in bone stock form it's got a ton of power and cranks out more juice than any of the bikes with race pipes"”how crazy is that!? Sure the chassis would need a few mods including re-sprung suspension and a LCR shock link but other than some body work and numbers it would be pretty easy to make race ready...
this is an exc. point, bmw as thrown tons of money on the bike in racing and yet it's only actually starting doing well in wsbk this season.
And???? There are a hell of a lot of people that are faster than you are or I. All this proves is that Neil was faster on the BMW than the Pani. Hell Checa might be faster on the BMW, but it still doesn't explain the lack of S1000RRs and CBR1000RRs on the grid. You don't find it surprising for a bike that is SO much easier to go faster on, that no privateers are riding it? You don't find it surprising that a bike like the CBR which has been around for years and has dealers on every corner and parts readily available, that privateers consistently select the Gixxer over it? Don't believe everything you read my friend. Go out and try them for yourself and draw your own conclusion. There's a reason none are on the grid and suspect it has nothing to with their price point?He's a former world champ and a hell of a lot faster than you or I... that warrants something.
Finally someone who gets it!!!!Guys, the Panigale is already winning races. And yes I realize the bikes in Superstock 1k are Panigales on steroids (or at least supplements in WSTK, full steroids in WSBK), but the base package is still an 1199, and it's competitive in it's infancy and representing itself and company quite well. I think this bike is gonna do as well as any Ducati in WSBK too, and we're talking about the winningest company in the history of the class.
Ducati make their reputation on the track in the highest forms of racing (in this case WSBK), and if the 1199 is dud there, I might be concerned. But I seriously doubt this is gonna happen.
I just read this "test" and stared at the charts in disbelief, surely something is wrong with these guys? But you are not alone. Down here our Motorcycle news mag did their annual AusTest. The Pani came in just behind the RSV and the BMW ( these 3 were a cut above the japs).
It was said, because it had so much adjustment ( it was an S) we felt it fairer to the rest to turn it all off...I kid you not. Then complained the suspension needed setting up.
I was actually in the Pits when this was happening, almost like they wanted it to fail.
I sold my BMWS 1000 to get the Pani, and to me it feels like a step forward for sure. I have the S and I spent some time getting each map set up for me and I now have 3 riding modes that I simply change depending on the road ahead... Brilliant.
I shake my head at the so called testers.
I have a race Honda CBR1000rr and the reason I have this is simply for costs. They are cheap to buy, to maintain and parts are plentiful and cheap. If I could afford it I would race European, but I don't have the funds, that is why at domestic club type level, the japs rule.
Anyway, at the Fomula XTreme race 2 weeks ago in Sydney, Craig McMartin ( ex pro twins champion on an 1098R) had his new Pani there. It rained for practice so he didn't qualify. Started on the last row of the grid. In a 6 lap dash he came second only pipped by a zx at the end. Second race he walked away with it.
His comments, regarding racing the new Pani and his 1098r ... " no comparison" the Pani is far superior everywhere.
After reading this USA test I went back and had a look at their 2011 comparison. The 1098 came last. Now come on. No one can believe that bike deserves that place on a track. Something really weird with these testers for sure.
Enjoy your bikes guys.
And???? There are a hell of a lot of people that are faster than you are or I. All this proves is that Neil was faster on the BMW than the Pani. Hell Checa might be faster on the BMW, but it still doesn't explain the lack of S1000RRs and CBR1000RRs on the grid. You don't find it surprising for a bike that is SO much easier to go faster on, that no privateers are riding it? You don't find it surprising that a bike like the CBR which has been around for years and has dealers on every corner and parts readily available, that privateers consistently select the Gixxer over it? Don't believe everything you read my friend. Go out and try them for yourself and draw your own conclusion. There's a reason none are on the grid and suspect it has nothing to with their price point?
ahh the classic....why shootouts suck thread when your bike doesn't come in first......lol.
Just ride what you like and like what you ride.
It's like a .... measuring contest.
IMO I think the best all around bike is the zx10. Don't really care what anyone else thinks. The pani is definately pure ... on wheels though.
ahh the classic....why shootouts suck thread when your bike doesn't come in first......lol.
Just ride what you like and like what you ride.
It's like a .... measuring contest.
IMO I think the best all around bike is the zx10. Don't really care what anyone else thinks. The pani is definately pure ... on wheels though.