V4 fuelling options

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

With tge woolich software the std etv values are modified across the rev range to get a true full throttle … there was a problem with this loading, they’ve sorted it now …
 
With tge woolich software the std etv values are modified across the rev range to get a true full throttle … there was a problem with this loading, they’ve sorted it now …

What do you mean true full trottle?

It is not and desirable to not fully open the throttle at lower revs as more TPS opening does not provide more airflow.

The table that Woolich called ETV Restrictions actually has no direct connection to the ETV and messing with it too much can cause diagnostics to activate limp home torque and rpm limits.

What happens when you globally change the so called ETV Restrictions table is that you kind of activate a quick action throttle.
 
I’m not messing with anything…. It’s woolich that are saying there was a problem and woolich that are providing the fix…… go get a latte👍
 
What do you mean true full trottle?

It is not and desirable to not fully open the throttle at lower revs as more TPS opening does not provide more airflow.

The table that Woolich called ETV Restrictions actually has no direct connection to the ETV and messing with it too much can cause diagnostics to activate limp home torque and rpm limits.

What happens when you globally change the so called ETV Restrictions table is that you kind of activate a quick action throttle.

I understand what you mean here but why would it be undesirable for the throttle bodies to fully open? Cable operated throttles manage this perfectly.
 
I understand what you mean here but why would it be undesirable for the throttle bodies to fully open? Cable operated throttles manage this perfectly.

At lower rpm ( below 6k on the V4 engines) maximum airflow is achieve already below the fully open throttle position of 82 degrees. So essentially there is a dead band where more TPS opening does not provide more airflow. This allows for quicker and more precise airflow and resulting torque modulation as you don’t have to sweep the throttle through a dead band first where no impact on torque takes place.
 
What do you mean true full trottle?

It is not and desirable to not fully open the throttle at lower revs as more TPS opening does not provide more airflow.

The table that Woolich called ETV Restrictions actually has no direct connection to the ETV and messing with it too much can cause diagnostics to activate limp home torque and rpm limits.

What happens when you globally change the so called ETV Restrictions table is that you kind of activate a quick action throttle.

Question, so what do the values in the ETV Restrictions table represent? I’ve been searching Woolich and google, but no info is available.
 
At lower rpm ( below 6k on the V4 engines) maximum airflow is achieve already below the fully open throttle position of 82 degrees. So essentially there is a dead band where more TPS opening does not provide more airflow. This allows for quicker and more precise airflow and resulting torque modulation as you don’t have to sweep the throttle through a dead band first where no impact on torque takes place.

I see... so it's restricting the throttle plate angle to maximize air flow at any given RPM.

I still don't see why a full 90 degrees open isn't achieved though.
 
Question, so what do the values in the ETV Restrictions table represent? I’ve been searching Woolich and google, but no info is available.

You cannot find this information from Woolich as they really do not know what it is for.

The table is a major input to the global engine airflow characterization structure. Messing with it will have a stronge affect on pretty much all of the rider torque requests. That is why Woolich thinks it is an ETV restriction table.
There is quite a large risk of messing with this table as there are other maps and table that need to be kept in line with with the values of this table in order to not cause undesirable drivability behavior and/or diagnostics that can cause torque limitations and ultimately limp home functionality.
 
I see... so it's restricting the throttle plate angle to maximize air flow at any given RPM.

I still don't see why a full 90 degrees open isn't achieved though.

In the ECU 0 degrees is defined as the butterfly valve is mechanically locked fully closed in the throttle bore. This normally happens at a static angle of around 3 to 4 degrees. From there on the count to 82 degrees starts. So the final angle is around 85 degrees perpendicular to the bore. As you have the throttle plate shaft in the center of the bore now at this angle the plate is shadowing the shaft and the last 5 degrees to full 90 will not have an affect on airflow anymore.
 
In the ECU 0 degrees is defined as the butterfly valve is mechanically locked fully closed in the throttle bore. This normally happens at a static angle of around 3 to 4 degrees. From there on the count to 82 degrees starts. So the final angle is around 85 degrees perpendicular to the bore. As you have the throttle plate shaft in the center of the bore now at this angle the plate is shadowing the shaft and the last 5 degrees to full 90 will not have an affect on airflow anymore.

This is reasonable.
 
You cannot find this information from Woolich as they really do not know what it is for.

The table is a major input to the global engine airflow characterization structure. Messing with it will have a stronge affect on pretty much all of the rider torque requests. That is why Woolich thinks it is an ETV restriction table.
There is quite a large risk of messing with this table as there are other maps and table that need to be kept in line with with the values of this table in order to not cause undesirable drivability behavior and/or diagnostics that can cause torque limitations and ultimately limp home functionality.

Yes! I have experience with late model cars that are torque/load based and they have several tables to match torque-to-load, load-to-torque, throttle requested load & torque, etc. There are likely more tables in the V4 ECU that Woolich hadn’t uncovered.
 
I'll be choosing between SLR and Woolwich, and I have a 22 V4 base. Additionally, I'll be installing the PipeWerx half system, which only connects to the headers already in place. It's a single exit system, and switching silencers based on track noise limitations is really extremely simple Tyler the Creator Merch. The Spark system is pretty comparable to this.
Maybe for most people used to TPS in % you should multiply the AIM TPS by 1.1 to WOT relates to 100%.
 
I'd be surprised if a Ducati dealer would install block off plates. The air valve which feeds the system can be disabled with some tuning products. I think SLR mentions it, I'm not sure if Woolich does. I don't know if the Akra map does.

Depending on how they do the Akra install, the EVAP can be deleted or remain. I'd ask about that and maybe insist on getting rid of it. The older kits came with the fittings to bypass it but there was a service document that said it wasn't necessary, etc.

Get the exhaust installed, have them flash it and ride it. Get some track days in and see if you even need to change anything.

I used two marbles pushed into each sais pipe beside the pair pump with silicone glue to block off. Then pulled the connector and switched it off in woolich. Merely switching off the Pair in woolich only stops the fault code. Air still comes into the Pair system.

The Akra map comes with the. Evap and Exup codes switched off. Can be done in woolich as well
 

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.

Recent Discussions

Back
Top