V4R Details?

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

Exactly my point. The works V4 is designed to win races and if an AD package helps to do that then by all means get it on there. The bike they sell at the dealership isn't that bike, its a bike that has to be sold to satisfy the rules and the guys who are buying them (with a few exceptions) are not those riders. Post up all the class winners from WERA and CCS a year from now and lets see how many guys are on the podium with a 40K dealer bike. For a street bike, the AD bits are a gimmick. The R is a "race inspired bike" based on a mandate. Awesome bike right out of the gate for sure but lets keep it real. Unlike Aprilia where you can actually go and buy a race bike, Ducati sell's "race inspired" bikes. If you want a Corse spec v4 R, you going to need some tools, some skills and an Amex card

Do you even understand WSBK homologation rules?
 
Well gosh Boba, I thought I did but by your tone its apparent that I was sadly mistaken so I assume the correct answer is no. Perhaps for my enlightenment and possibly the enlightenment others here could I trouble you for a detailed synopsis of the homologation spec as it pertains the the platform that is the topic of discussion. Thank you in advance.
 
Actually Boba to simplify things considerably, if you could just post the 2019 FIM homologation rules specific to "Wings and Aerodynamic aids" that would suffice as my content was specific to that category and your comment was not specific only implying that I had lack of general knowledge with regards to homologation rules in general which may be the case however I was quite specific in my reference content. The subset "wings and Aerodynamic aids" in the 2018 FIM Technical Rules manual is undefined so until it is defined, your comment with regard to my lack of understanding regarding homologation is not relevant. I look forward to the education. Thank you.
 
Exactly my point. The works V4 is designed to win races and if an AD package helps to do that then by all means get it on there. The bike they sell at the dealership isn't that bike, its a bike that has to be sold to satisfy the rules and the guys who are buying them (with a few exceptions) are not those riders. Post up all the class winners from WERA and CCS a year from now and lets see how many guys are on the podium with a 40K dealer bike. For a street bike, the AD bits are a gimmick. The R is a "race inspired bike" based on a mandate. Awesome bike right out of the gate for sure but lets keep it real. Unlike Aprilia where you can actually go and buy a race bike, Ducati sell's "race inspired" bikes. If you want a Corse spec v4 R, you going to need some tools, some skills and an Amex card

How can you say the AD bits are a gimmick for a street bike? How can you defy laws of physics with such a blunt statement? Those winglets will add downforce with speeds as little as 120km+ and reach that top level of downforce at near 280km/h. They will add that downforce irrespective of rider skill and irrespective if the rider feels any benefit or not.

Thus they can't really be a gimmick!



LOL well you are absolutely correct, that brand has shown time and time again that they don't give 2 ..... about their customers or the issues with their bikes. Lots of colorful fruits, veggies and nicely placed garnish, just not a lot of meat and potatoes. They are all about colored coordinated back packs and branded accessories and getting the most money they can for what they sell. Ask them what they put into amateur racing or how accessible their RS parts are etc.

If you are so dissatisfied with the brand so much, and so dismissive of whatever thing you consider to be a gimmick why not change brands? What's stoping you from pursuing your satisfaction from ANYTHING out there? What's with all the hate really?

I still don't like their bodged power-to-weight numbers of bhp per kg using dry weight. It makes no sense, that machine can't function or produce that power at that weight, it would self destruct.......

I tend to agree but there has been a lot of subjective weight figures and someone's wet weight might be different from other manufacturer. For example BMW used to publish their weights according to some DIN standard -Full of fuel, oil, coolant, tools, battery etc ... ready to run ... while others might not count in the wet weight the tools for example. Or they'd tell you 85% tank full or stuff like that. So another figure was thrown into the mix. Dry weight, without fluids like gas, oil, coolant.

While your last observation is correct, one would argue that the machine can't function as intended, without a human on it and thus a human must be considered, as the car manufacturers generally consider a human male of 75kgs as the driver. All a bunch of BS ofc.
 
guys, relax! It is almost Christmas, peace on earth for everybody.
You can like them or not, you can get a boner from these wings or you totally dry up.. But frankly, i don't care :D

Take some gluhwein, eat too much and listen to Mariah Carey and Wham...

And then go behind your computer, come to this forum and bitch about the R-wings :D
 
Actually Boba to simplify things considerably, if you could just post the 2019 FIM homologation rules specific to "Wings and Aerodynamic aids" that would suffice as my content was specific to that category and your comment was not specific only implying that I had lack of general knowledge with regards to homologation rules in general which may be the case however I was quite specific in my reference content. The subset "wings and Aerodynamic aids" in the 2018 FIM Technical Rules manual is undefined so until it is defined, your comment with regard to my lack of understanding regarding homologation is not relevant. I look forward to the education. Thank you.

Straight from the wsbk website:

The use of aerodynamic components (e.g. "˜wings'), would only be permitted if fitted on the homologated model sold in the Europe, Japan and North America.
 
Ok thanks so that's a statement on the WSBK website. Still not defined in the FIM book but OK. So the wings were obviously positioned on the works bike in some sort of calculated manner. This is traditionally done with the bike in race trim, with the rider in the wind tunnel. The airfoil sections are positioned (tuned) to the application so how does this translate to a general setting for a street bike? It doesn't and multiple people have answered this. The wings for the street were so installed to comply with the homologation. They are not tunnel tuned like the works bikes because they can't be. So in the end, they are a gimmick on a street bike. AndreiD If you really think that your particular skill sets warrant the addition of those wings on street bike then well damn, you sir are one ass kicking individual. Do you really think in any real world scenario that removing the wings off the R is going to be a measurable difference to anyone on this board? Its OK to just come out and say "F it, I like the way the wings look" there is nothing wrong with that. People like what they like but to defend it to the end that those wings are going to somehow translate into something tangible from a performance perspective on a street driven motorcycle is just not sane thinking. "yea but they add down force with speeds as low as 120kmh" Dude are you having stability issues with the bike you have now at 75 mph? If you are not, then well maybe you don't need wings. Care to guess at the number of accidents that would have been avoided with the addition of the wings from a stability perspective? zero and I'm just guessing that if the guys here who are racing Ducati's and are able to control the bikes on the track without wings that just maybe, having the wings on a street bike may not be needed.
 
Ok thanks so that's a statement on the WSBK website. Still not defined in the FIM book but OK. So the wings were obviously positioned on the works bike in some sort of calculated manner. This is traditionally done with the bike in race trim, with the rider in the wind tunnel. The airfoil sections are positioned (tuned) to the application so how does this translate to a general setting for a street bike? It doesn't and multiple people have answered this. The wings for the street were so installed to comply with the homologation. They are not tunnel tuned like the works bikes because they can't be. So in the end, they are a gimmick on a street bike. AndreiD If you really think that your particular skill sets warrant the addition of those wings on street bike then well damn, you sir are one ass kicking individual. Do you really think in any real world scenario that removing the wings off the R is going to be a measurable difference to anyone on this board? Its OK to just come out and say "F it, I like the way the wings look" there is nothing wrong with that. People like what they like but to defend it to the end that those wings are going to somehow translate into something tangible from a performance perspective on a street driven motorcycle is just not sane thinking. "yea but they add down force with speeds as low as 120kmh" Dude are you having stability issues with the bike you have now at 75 mph? If you are not, then well maybe you don't need wings. Care to guess at the number of accidents that would have been avoided with the addition of the wings from a stability perspective? zero and I'm just guessing that if the guys here who are racing Ducati's and are able to control the bikes on the track without wings that just maybe, having the wings on a street bike may not be needed.


All your posts are negative! What is your problem?? If you dont like the bike or cant justify it then let it be already.
 
The thread started with a video explaining what the wings were and what they did and you immediately stated they are dumb and only usable at 180 mph. When other people tried to explain to you that aerodynamics don't just kick on at x speed you doubled down and went straight to ridicule and stating that only pro racers could benefit from passive stability assistance. Nobody here stated they wanted them to be street rossi just that they could benefit anyone regardless of skill no matter how small assistance is still assistance
 
Wait, stop the presses, MAC was kind enough to post the spec. I now concede, gotta have the wings. I was about to go for a blast up the toll roads but I am now not at all comfortable with the probable instability issues and uncontrollable wheelies that await me. Mick you need to get on the wings young man. Knock those things out and YoungR, those FGR 300s sure are pretty but you don't stand a chance on that thing unless Mick gets cracking.
 
Zues, awesome post. Benefit how? What benefit are you going to see on the street that the guy with the wingless V4S will not experience? Enlighten us.
 
Oh and Zeus, I read your original post "let people have their fun" this isn't fun damnit, these are wings were talking here, wings are serious business. This isn't Dr Phil, there are no back rubs or tissues here well except when Mark is on then there are the obligatory # 46 tissues but you get it now buck campers. What they should have done is included a helmet like the one in the Rocketeer with the steerable rudder on top. Oh well, maybe 2020. I'll drop GiGi a note.
 
au contraire (I think thats french) Mr Karp. I like the R and well, I fly planes so certainly wings. Do I think with a few mods the R with a few mods would make a great race bike for series racers? Sure do. Do I think that the R out of the box would make an outstanding track bike? Sure do. Do I think a bike that makes its power in the stratosphere RPM range, uses a single oil ring piston and has wings on it is a good idea for a street bike. Uh *&%$ no because it's not. Pretty straight forward.
 
Leftcoast32, Dude you are in Carlsbad, Im in Newport Coast. Let go ride. Im really only a dick on the board ok well thats not true but I am less of a dick in person (jeez one of you guys vouch for me will ya).
 
The V4R will take the same Akra exhaust as the other V4 models, only difference is the mapping that gets downloaded to the ECU. When we first got them we were told to plan for around 6 hours and after installing a couple it was clear that it's a 2-day job for one tech to complete so we charge 10 hours for the install. I wish it wasn't that, but that's reality. Everything is so tightly packaged and lots of "stuff" to disassemble to get to everything and then put it all back together.

Unless I'm mistaken all of the shots of the R already have the pipes with stock end cans? Maybe just not in titanium? so you may be able to get the full performance with slip-ons, just not the weight savings.

Just an observation.

The "R" has different primary tubes than the other models. Is it possible the only real difference between it and the full Akra is the second half of the exhaust?

anyone got any more details about the Akra race system?
Is it different to the one on the 1103cc motor?
Is the R oem downpipe same as the Ti race system but just an SS pipe?
Are the primary (downpipe tubes) different on the R?

19DFFA57E5338EA3C683E59B6176EBFF.png

pic from Ducati configurator of the akra system, part number same as on the 1103 motor?
https://configurator.ducati.com/bikes/ww/en/superbike/panigale-v4-r/3503064/?cid=ZBJP5KVMN2G0WNY
v4r configurator
 
So my v4r has arrived, pdi done! Akra race exhaust fitted and some carbon bits, eco tech rad guards and tail tidy.
Removing clutch cover before collecting which hoping will be next Saturday!
Fired it up today and OMG!✊
Can't wait!
 
Congrats!! Mine will be here in about 2 weeks!! Then Full Akro being installed, Carbon fiber clutch cover, Racing Switches both sides, kickstand delete, Quick change disk setup and full Racing prep... I will be Racing mine the End of April at Thunderbolt in NJ. USA..
 

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.
Back
Top