AR Inconel Install

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

I was looking at the owner's manual and lt says for the ebc if you turn it to off you have maximum engine braking. you have to set it to 3 to have minimum engine braking. this is different then the tc and abs as you need to set that to off. not sure if that would make a difference on the dyno.
 
Good Morning.

The only thing we have shown definitively so far is that a Pani with 400km and a full Termi system, and a Pani with 13,000km and a full AR system both produce marginally less power and torque, untuned, than the latter bike with Termi slips and the latest OEM map.

What I have learnt is that unless you can match the exact bike & dyno setup of the manufacturer then you will be unable to achieve the advertised power and torque numbers.
The only problem I have with this is that these factors are not advertised as a disclaimer.

The basic claim that has caused so much contention here was that AR claimed their system was better and developing power than the Termi full system. Something that I hope to be able to prove or disprove as the other bike gets run in but without the tune this is not the case, they are almost identical at peak figures. I know this doesn't mean it can't outperform Termis just that we haven't replicated that performance.

The AR system is significantly lighter, and is louder. (Whether it sounds better is a subjective call, I think it does at full chat but not necessarily at idle)

The heat generated with no tune seemed no different to the stock headers. Maybe that will change with proper fuelling.

The key question for me is whether, allowing for our available dyno conditions, is whether we are able to beat or equal the full Termis because otherwise I've potentially voided my warranty for limited physical and aesthetic benefit (again I agree that weight & sound might be viewed as reason alone to do this for some but these were secondary reasons for me).

The AR system appears to be like any other full race system in that is a starting point for a power bike, requiring considerable work and specific mapping setup to extract the claimed figures. I was hoping (maybe naively) for a better result out of the box because I know how hard it is to magic up HP without engine work. I am now hoping that a good tune will help resolve.

I will endeavour to answer that in time and until then I'll suspend any further judgement. My gut feel is that I will actually really enjoy the pipes if I can get them fuelling beautifully, and that they will be at least as good power wise as what I would have got out of the Termi system, unique sound and more exclusive (can you hear me starting to post rationalise? Something Ducati owners are good at ;) I might try the RB module just for the sake of testing, after all what's another 640GBP between friends!

Looking forward,to giving you some more insight shortly.
 
Last edited:
Fatty thanks for being honest with your findings it's much appreciated and a rareity .
Hope you get what your after but from a selfish perspective thanks for saving me some money as I was considering swapping out my full system .
The noise level would certainly be a concern our bikes are getting DB tested at most tracks these days and it looks like it going to get worse and it seems that the HP figures are small .
 
Wouldn't be surprised if WAfatboy regains the lost midrange and ends up at 180+ whp once this is all said and done. I'm more concerned with midrange increase over the benchmark configuration when all is said and done. Patiently awaiting results.
 
Wouldn't be surprised if WAfatboy regains the lost midrange and ends up at 180+ whp once this is all said and done. I'm more concerned with midrange increase over the benchmark configuration when all is said and done. Patiently awaiting results.

Maybe . I think I could most likely get the same sort of gains with better mapping with the full Termi without swapping out the zaust .
 
I think the solution is obvious. You need to ship the bike to the UK and have it run on Austin Racings dyno. That should give you the results you were expecting:D
 
i think the solution is obvious. You need to ship the bike to the uk and have it run on austin racings dyno. That should give you the results you were expecting:d

:d:d:d
 
If we divulged how we get to our power gains we may as well send that info directly to our competitors.

Looking at a possible group buy for the next batch of Inconel systems, this may help reduce costs and give a better forum deal.

Unless WA's situation changes, you will have a tough time convincing people that it is a "sound" purchase over Termis. Just sayin', not hating.
 
Unless WA's situation changes, you will have a tough time convincing people that it is a "sound" purchase over Termis. Just sayin', not hating.

it is significantly lighter and really does sound badass. those alone for me are enough. i never ever bought into the hp claims anyhow -- it's essentially a very convoluted straight pipe....the price is stratospheric for these types of plumbings, exotic materials notwithstanding.

i think the biggest issue here is that WAf has a 205HP license plate, a $4K bit of plumbing and he's over 35HP short ;) He may have to get a new license plate :D
 
Last edited:
it is significantly lighter and really does sound badass. those alone for me are enough. i never ever bought into the hp claims anyhow -- it's essentially a very convoluted straight pipe....the price is stratospheric for these types of plumbings, exotic materials notwithstanding.

Point well taken, I am more of a "clean fueling" type of a fella myself. Numbers don't mean much to me, driveability speaks volumes to me, driveability will suffer if the HPs lower.
 
Unless WA's situation changes, you will have a tough time convincing people that it is a "sound" purchase over Termis. Just sayin', not hating.

I think it's still a viable alternative to the full termi's for people with stock exhaust, of course excluding the warranty issues. But, I think the 2 groups hedging now are those with the full termi's who considered changing for 15 or more HP gains and the slip-on folks who saved a .... load of money and have equally if not better performing exhaust.
 
I think it's still a viable alternative to the full termi's for people with stock exhaust, of course excluding the warranty issues. But, I think the 2 groups hedging now are those with the full termi's who considered changing for 15 or more HP gains and the slip-on folks who saved a .... load of money and have equally if not better performing exhaust.

Keep in mind, the ONLY reason this forum thinks the slip ons are better than the full Termi system is based on feedback and results from the very same Austin Racing dyno that is the source of the current issue with WA. You know, the one who's owner has been subtly discrediting the Termi full system for months now perhaps to better position his product....and this is coming from a slip on owner. Say what you want, but it is at least food for thought.
 
I think it's still a viable alternative to the full termi's for people with stock exhaust, of course excluding the warranty issues. But, I think the 2 groups hedging now are those with the full termi's who considered changing for 15 or more HP gains and the slip-on folks who saved a .... load of money and have equally if not better performing exhaust.
I am still optimistic to see what will come post-tuning, I keep telling myself---"Maybe the ECU was having a bad day and didn't feel like adapting to new changes. Perhaps ECU wasn't inspired by our President's Forward slogan today":D?". I am hoping that it could be rectified, it would be cool to see a close to 190whp machine with squeeky (i know that i misspelled that) clean fueling.
 
Keep in mind, the ONLY reason this forum thinks the slip ons are better than the full Termi system is based on feedback and results from the very same Austin Racing dyno that is the source of the current issue with WA. You know, the one who's owner has been subtly discrediting the Termi full system for months now perhaps to better position his product....and this is coming from a slip on owner. Say what you want, but it is at least food for thought.

+1
 
Keep in mind, the ONLY reason this forum thinks the slip ons are better than the full Termi system is based on feedback and results from the very same Austin Racing dyno that is the source of the current issue with WA. You know, the one who's owner has been subtly discrediting the Termi full system for months now perhaps to better position his product....and this is coming from a slip on owner. Say what you want, but it is at least food for thought.

Of course, believe me I'm not taking any of this as gospel. I'm just saying that I know there are some people with termi's that were considering a new exhaust. This would cause them to take pause... That's all.
 
Of course, believe me I'm not taking any of this as gospel. I'm just saying that I know there are some people with termi's that were considering a new exhaust. This would cause them to take pause... That's all.

Not just pause I hope.... I mean unless something changes dramatically why would anyone spend $4k (cough):eek: on this product???
 
Not just pause I hope.... I mean unless something changes dramatically why would anyone spend $4k (cough):eek: on this product???
Ahhh...... the full Termi system is only a few Benjamin's short of $4k and superstock system is $600 more!
 
Last edited:

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.
Back
Top