- Joined
- Dec 18, 2020
- Messages
- 1,182
- Location
- Italy
IMHO endodoc managed to arrive to a valid point after a lot of shitalk. It's preference. If you're racing, there's a whole economy to the situation in play beyond the specs and laps times. That's a complex array of network, sponsors, pilot preference, costs & access to parts etc. and all that. To your point, the difference on paper tech specs, is marginal with a whole list of sportbikes these days. We've arrived to a limit of physics for the situation of tire, wheelie / traction control, handling etc.
When you just want to go ride, it's about feel and more abstract things. It's just personal preference and what YOU can do on your bike.
In 2007 Ducati had by far the fastest bike on the MotoGP circuit, and the list of pilots who could make it go faster than all the others was one single positions, Casey Stoner.
The new desmosedici is mounted backwards and a little left, making it one of the only production bikes ever with balanced gyroscopic forces. So it also turns better. It's not a typical 4 cylindar screamer, it's the one and only twin pulse I've ever heard of which means traction advantages are similar to the V2, over the typical inline 4s. So they are working on those physics limits too. But that's not my point.
When I said the "march through to 6th gas pinned down a straight, the V2 can't touch," I mean the feel, the sound, the level of omfg.
But that's just me. You be you.
So why you got to .... on the n00bs?

When you just want to go ride, it's about feel and more abstract things. It's just personal preference and what YOU can do on your bike.
In 2007 Ducati had by far the fastest bike on the MotoGP circuit, and the list of pilots who could make it go faster than all the others was one single positions, Casey Stoner.
The new desmosedici is mounted backwards and a little left, making it one of the only production bikes ever with balanced gyroscopic forces. So it also turns better. It's not a typical 4 cylindar screamer, it's the one and only twin pulse I've ever heard of which means traction advantages are similar to the V2, over the typical inline 4s. So they are working on those physics limits too. But that's not my point.
When I said the "march through to 6th gas pinned down a straight, the V2 can't touch," I mean the feel, the sound, the level of omfg.
But that's just me. You be you.
So why you got to .... on the n00bs?
Agreed and that was kinda my point. There are a quite a few 4 cylinder bikes to choose from and really only one twin in that performance category. That was what drew me to the 1299. Regardless of the performance gain (power or otherwise) for me the V4 was just another 4 cylinder bike in the lineup of a lot of good 4 cylinder bikes. Its just a different bike but to say that the V4 is way beyond the 99 for me is a bit of a stretch. Again look at the lap times of the two with the same riders. Hardly night and day.