Standard procedure. You wouldn’t believe what they do to mclarens and Ferrari’s right off the truck.
Do you spend time thinking up this garbage or does it spew forth freely?
First, besides the inside pre-road test procedures, Ferrari has a specific run in protocol on a specific loop at the factory that’s over 50 miles. They also have a separate building to fix and address various issues that pop up at run-in. Then, when they cars are delivered, the pdi process is fairly specific and these days, the factory gets all the diagnostic info from the PDI process. There’s no “you wouldn’t believe what they do to these right off the truck,” fantasy that you’re putting out there.
You don’t know what I do for a living but trust me when I tell you that this isn’t hearsay or something that I learned from some tv show or anything else. This is first hand info from my own work meetings in Maranello and other facilities.
the Superleggera gets a new engine or rebuild ever 3,000 miles or so. U think there’s a 600 miles break in period where they need to be babied? I certainly would not be paying those prices for a bike that needs to be babied ever few thousand miles. But I wouldn’t buy one anyway
Secondly, where do you get the ........ that a Superleggera has to be rebuilt every three thousand miles? I am approaching three thousand miles on mine now and it’s perfect. In fact, it was just run on the dyno a couple of months ago and it produces 2hp more than it did when it was on the dyno at 800 miles. And I‘ve ridden that bike at the track so while it's been extraordinarily well taken care of, it hasn't been babied.
There are a million reasons not to buy a Superleggera but an engine rebuild every 3,000 miles isn't one of them.
You keep spouting off with ........ you know nothing about and at some point, someone is going to be dumb enough to think you know what you’re talking about. And that’s how bad information spreads.
There’s a ton of stuff that I
don’t know about these newer Ducatis and I come here to learn about them. I came here initially because the info was highly regarded and mostly accurate. But it has gotten decidedly less accurate as of late. When I see someone spouting off information as factual that I personally know is wrong, its a problem for me.
Whats the point of having an Internet forum as a resource if it doesn’t have accurate and reliable information? If people come on here and just make .... up as they see fit, how would you ever know what to believe and what to discard? This is how misinformation spreads and this is exactly what takes a forum like this one from a respected source of information to an unreliable ........ machine that people stay away from.