- Joined
- Dec 19, 2012
- Messages
- 893
- Location
- U.S.A.
I have not read all the responses, so all of this has probably been debated. I roadraced at an amateur level 35 years ago so I'm not without experience in this discussion.
First of all, quit talking about the fact the guy should not have run off the track. This is why we have track days....so that an inexperienced rider can go out and have fun. Very few people who have raced or tracked have never gone off the track.
The sand bags should not have been there. I do think there was a degree of negligence there. For many, many years tracks have worked hard to make the tracks safer. That was inexcusable.
Next, don't blame the rider or the lawyers. They don't make the rules. The courts and the laws of the land make the rules. If you don't like it blame the law makers. I fully agree that we pay out way too much in "damages" in this country. In this case there was probably contributory negligence and I'd be okay with the track being held responsible for half of the actual damages and medical expenses, but no more.
I don't necessarily think that signing a waiver eliminates the ability to file claims when there is negligence. We as individuals are at a huge disadvantage when businesses have the means to have attorneys write contracts that as individuals we simply don't have the means to fully understand or negotiate.
But again, I'm talking about negligence being the key here. Was it or was it not negligence on the part of the track? That should be the only grounds for a lawsuit in my opinion, and only actual damages caused by negligence should be considered.
First of all, quit talking about the fact the guy should not have run off the track. This is why we have track days....so that an inexperienced rider can go out and have fun. Very few people who have raced or tracked have never gone off the track.
The sand bags should not have been there. I do think there was a degree of negligence there. For many, many years tracks have worked hard to make the tracks safer. That was inexcusable.
Next, don't blame the rider or the lawyers. They don't make the rules. The courts and the laws of the land make the rules. If you don't like it blame the law makers. I fully agree that we pay out way too much in "damages" in this country. In this case there was probably contributory negligence and I'd be okay with the track being held responsible for half of the actual damages and medical expenses, but no more.
I don't necessarily think that signing a waiver eliminates the ability to file claims when there is negligence. We as individuals are at a huge disadvantage when businesses have the means to have attorneys write contracts that as individuals we simply don't have the means to fully understand or negotiate.
But again, I'm talking about negligence being the key here. Was it or was it not negligence on the part of the track? That should be the only grounds for a lawsuit in my opinion, and only actual damages caused by negligence should be considered.