Professionals Race the S

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

I don't think his "specially made tyre" comment was meant to be taken at face value, especially considering he spelled tire wrong.

Having more than one tire manufacturer would lead to more diverse tire choices with teams being able to choose which design better suits their bike and rider's preference.

I’m inclined to agree - bring back Bridgestone!
 
Problem with multiple tyre manufacturers, the riders not on the winning tyre, put the sole reason for victory, down to the tyres. And, tyres, are essentially boring (for the viewing public).
For the manufacturers, multiple tyres are excellent, as the tyres can be made to offset bike characteristics - special tyres. Lovely.
 
Problem with multiple tyre manufacturers, the riders not on the winning tyre, put the sole reason for victory, down to the tyres. And, tyres, are essentially boring (for the viewing public).
For the manufacturers, multiple tyres are excellent, as the tyres can be made to offset bike characteristics - special tyres. Lovely.

Yep - that’s definitely the downside. To offset that, maybe don’t require season-long tire contracts?
 
they all have the same rules... ish....and they all know and have the same tyres.....some of the best engineers on the planet..figure it out or lose!
 
Yeah, fans of a sport should have nothing to say about the way it’s conducted - just shut up and be glad you get to watch at all.

Never mind that discussing process and “armchair quarterbacking” aren’t even the same.

The fans of the sport are buying a product that Dorna sells, thats why they call it a "show" and read David Emmets thoughtful articles over at Motomatters before calling 2 sentence opinions on a chatboard a discussion.
 
they all have the same rules... ish....and they all know and have the same tyres.....some of the best engineers on the planet..figure it out or lose!
Well that "ish" part is rather significant reason it took Ducati 15 years to win another world title.
The single tire that everyone gets was optimized for Honda and was a disaster for Ducati. They had to get those engineers to reinvent the bike to make it work with those tires and still be a Ducati. This goes back to 20 discussions already reviewed on Ducati designing a bike needing a tire with a flexible carcass and tough tread as it always had a brick stiff bike with 'engine as stress member,' part of the fame and insane torque. Honda wants a stiff carcass / soft tread, going with super flexible frame, softer power delivery. Ducati chewed those tired and spit them every race and couldn't turn anymore because there was no more 'last-inch' lateral suspension from the tires.

Here's the math:
Honda sells 19,000,000 bikes a year
Ducati sells 55,000 bikes a year, and puts Pirellis on them.
Who's going to get what they want?
Michelin wins every race. Win on Sunday sell on Monday. If you only win 5 races a year (because Bridgstone was winning the other 20) you're not going to pay for your MotoGP dev costs. Put Michelins on a few million new Honda sales and you've covered your MotoGP dev costs.
This is why the single tire rule in a prototype manufacturer race.
 
Well that "ish" part is rather significant reason it took Ducati 15 years to win another world title.
The single tire that everyone gets was optimized for Honda and was a disaster for Ducati. They had to get those engineers to reinvent the bike to make it work with those tires and still be a Ducati. This goes back to 20 discussions already reviewed on Ducati designing a bike needing a tire with a flexible carcass and tough tread as it always had a brick stiff bike with 'engine as stress member,' part of the fame and insane torque. Honda wants a stiff carcass / soft tread, going with super flexible frame, softer power delivery. Ducati chewed those tired and spit them every race and couldn't turn anymore because there was no more 'last-inch' lateral suspension from the tires.

Here's the math:
Honda sells 19,000,000 bikes a year
Ducati sells 55,000 bikes a year, and puts Pirellis on them.
Who's going to get what they want?
Michelin wins every race. Win on Sunday sell on Monday. If you only win 5 races a year (because Bridgstone was winning the other 20) you're not going to pay for your MotoGP dev costs. Put Michelins on a few million new Honda sales and you've covered your MotoGP dev costs.
This is why the single tire rule in a prototype manufacturer race.

Absolutely spot on Vbreeze.

I seem to remember, a few years ago at Jerez, Michelin brought a different tyre, and Rossi did much better than at other rounds. But they switched the tyre back at the next round.
 
Meanwhile in the real world, Hondas come with Dunlops.

In sports bike world they dont
1668095132673.png
 
That maybe the pet theory about Honda using Michelins on its bikes cause MotoGP development cost reasons, wasn't quite grounded in reality.

I thought that was pretty obvious.
 

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.
Back
Top