- Joined
- Jul 10, 2020
- Messages
- 5,998
- Location
- Midwest
No good reason. Maybe because so many people seem to fawn over him?
I was never a Rossi fan either.
Cause reasons.
No good reason. Maybe because so many people seem to fawn over him?
I was never a Rossi fan either.
I think he had over a 20 point lead going into the last race.
At 25 he's the oldest(!) MotoGP rider to get a maiden championship win. I suppose that's better than those dude that peaked in high school sports.
Wins and poles don’t necessarily equal championships. See Mir’s 2020 championship where he won 1 race.7 wins
6 pole positions
In a season when the top 15 riders are generally lapping within a second of each other.
Looks pretty solid to me.
Wins and poles don’t necessarily equal championships. See Mir’s 2020 championship where he won 1 race.
5 retirements and the first 4 races were abysmal don’t help your situation. There’s another adage, luck is what you make of it.
I prefer: "To finish first, you must first finish" as that is irrefutable.
But in terms of lady luck when winning the title, it could be argued that Mir had better luck than Bagnia: not much consistent competition and a shorter season.
Of course, Marquez being (largely) absent the last 3 years had a big effect... 2023 is likely to be very different!
All champions are killers, some hide it better
I’m inclined to agree. Rossi made quite a few controversial moves iirc.
Same boat as Yamaha. They got by on rider talent. Fabio and Marc are exceptional no doubt, but there's been some lack luster innovation and the other manufacturers past them by.Honda was the only manufacturer without a win this season
Maybe if they dropped the single tire nonsense the field would be more diverse.
I don't think his "specially made tyre" comment was meant to be taken at face value, especially considering he spelled tire wrong.
Having more than one tire manufacturer would lead to more diverse tire choices with teams being able to choose which design better suits their bike and rider's preference.