- Joined
- Feb 10, 2018
- Messages
- 2,186
- Location
- NYC
To me the most impressive thing was the Electronic suspension working for these guys, that and even for 8 laps the bikes didnt overheat...
Mutual respect bro.
A v4 rs wsbk makes ~250 to the tire.
A stock v4 makes ~195.
What’s a v4 with filter, exhaust, and tune make - 215 being charitable?
That’s 20 from being derestricted. Where’s the other 35 coming from?
To me the most impressive thing was the Electronic suspension working for these guys, that and even for 8 laps the bikes didnt overheat...
I'd think 250 at the tire, taking into account driveline loss at 12-15% (which is a low) which would be 246-255 HP at the tire, is MotoGP range. I'd bet there's significant electronic intervention going on to keep that in check.
Obviously they're using SBK spec (or close to) tires... Which i believe can be bought by anyone.
This does not take anything away from how impressive these stock bikes are and the level of optimisation they're at from the showroom.
$30k bike and what? $10k in track prep? exhaust, springs, tires, pads etc.. for 95% performance of a top level equipment. I'll take it!
I haven’t said I think the stock bikes are unimpressive.
I’m saying I don’t accept that Pecco is nearly as fast on a mildly modified v4s as Rossi was on the Yamaha gp21.
235 at the crank is ~210 to the tire. You think that’s realistic?
My base v4 made ~195 to the tire with no mods. A stock R makes more than that.
MotoGP bikes are reportedly near 300 to the tire.
Sounds like a bunch of women at a luncheon.
Believe it.
Pecco’s Q2 pole time last year at Misano was 1m33.0s. Rossi’s Q time was 1m38.3s
...on commercially available production tires.
I think 210 HP at the tire is more realistic than 300 HP at the tire, yes. It is an R engine after all. I'm not up on every tech rule in WSBK, but I don't think there's too much they can do with the internals and they didn't port and polish their way to 25% more horsepower.
Not to take too much away from the engine's performance, but I bet the WSBK version of an R is faster than the showroom version because of tires, suspension, brakes and weight reduction.
Who's to say they were?
If you make a race bike, are you going to tell all your competitors exactly how much power you're making?
But, for marketing purposes, you HAVE to make more than the street bike. But you don't want to say you make too much more
I know a guy who has a V4RS motor in his V4R. He hates it. It's way too fast....
Maybe go back and ensure you’ve read every post? I based the premise of my skepticism on the assertion that these are mildly modified stock bikes NOT running wsbk spec tires.
Where is the difference in the S vs R? Bore? Stroke? Both?
Where is the difference in the S vs R? Bore? Stroke? Both?
Maybe go back and ensure you’ve read every post? I based the premise of my skepticism on the assertion that these are mildly modified stock bikes NOT running wsbk spec tires.