- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 3,040
- Location
- USA
We're still only talking about the results of one bike, right? I've been wrenching long enough to know that sometimes mistakes can be made during the process of tuning and wrenching that can very well affect the results. We're talking about a small sample and as much as I begin to form an opinion based on the original post, I do realize that the evidence supporting ARs claims are also valid (AR has a stellar reputation).
AR, unlike no other manufacturer, came to us and allowed us to be part of the product development and design and truly appreciated our feedback during the development cycle. That says a hell of a lot about them--namely that they care about what we think. I've seen enough from Rich product-wise and post-wise, to believe that there's no way he'd intentionally mislead us.
With all the effort Rich put into ARs exhaust I completely understand his defensive reaction. (I'm pretty sure he'll agree he went a little too far after drinking a cold beer, though.) I'm suspending any judgement--and suspect that after the dust clears a different picture will emerge.
I agree.
I think we all need to drink a cold beer and see/observe the outcome. I hope we figure out this together (including AR folks, OP, and other that have questions) for the same interest of the love our bikes and amazing efforts like AR and to those who wants to know what they are buying.