- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,246
- Location
- Perth, Western Australia
Doesnt really matter. What I was pointing out was the variances in treatment between certain vendors vs others when you said vendors were held to a different standard. You have one exhaust manufacturer who made some claims that you are finding a bit difficult to reach. You have another vendor selling air filters claiming a 6hp increase but not getting any grief over it. Not here nor there.
My question to you WAf - would you rather have him on the forum or off ? There is nothing wrong with people posting, woudn't buy it, doesn't perform to claims, etc - but having Rich, Tuneboy, and even better others - is of benefit to the community. WOuld love someone from Akra, Zard, Termi, Ducati, Rizoma, etc, etc onboard as well. The point was that the community is better when more knowledge is present - regardless of commercial undertones or not. Not saying one should not address commercial claims or performance - just that taken within the context that its beneficial to have them onboard and available to all rather than withdrawn and not.
Maybe I'm the wrong person to ask, I've had far more useful information from independent forum members than I've had from manufacturers. If they make a positive contribution then great, if they disagree with what we say that's tough. The rules of the game have changed. The consumer has far more power than they ever have done through the free and unfettered exchange of views and information.
Once upon a time we would have seen a glossy ad in a bike mag and bought just on the strengths of the claims and never have been any the wiser. Advertisers were rarely held to account for their claims and the consumer suffered. Now we can call out a brand for under-delivering. Some brands haven't quite adjusted to this more egalitarian approach and it irks them. The brands that choose to engage positively even when things aren't going their way will be the real winners.
We don't need them, they need us.