Back in the shop

Ducati Forum

Help Support Ducati Forum:

Maybe the aerodynamic issue is totally unrelated, but I’ve found myself more interested in WSBK and MotoAmerica than ever before. MotoGP is still my favorite, but the other race series have been phenomenal. Tons of passes and tons of drama.

Agree 100%. WSBK was quite good this year, and Motoamerica was pretgood too.
 
Probably one of the few times I’d disagree w Craig. I look at the current MotoGP and see all the innovation and engineering. Everything that’s there is there to solve a problem and make the bike faster. With how the lap times keep dropping its easy to see they are accomplishing their goal.

I’m not sure aero development is dropping lap times all that significantly my friend. Lap times have been dropping, but only marginally for the last few years. Check out these Sachsenring pole times:

2005: 1:24.618

2010: 1:21.817 (2.801 secs faster than 2005)

2015: 1:20.336 (1.481 secs faster than 2010))

2019: 1:20.195 (0.141 secs faster than 2015)

2021: 1:20.236 (0.041 secs slower than 2019)

2022: 1:19.931 (0.305 secs faster than 2021)
 
sachsenring is the closest thing to a go kart track on the calendar, not the best ref point for gauging lap times with aero

One of the apparent advantages of Aero is to limit front wheel lift under hard acceleration so the power doesn't need to be cut as much, so i would think sachsenring would be a good reference
 
sachsenring is the closest thing to a go kart track on the calendar, not the best ref point for gauging lap times with aero
Its super hard to gauge the effectiveness of aero just off of one track too. I don't think anyone can make a reasonable argument against a statement that the bikes are getting faster as a result of the evolution of technology and riding style.

Aero is a part of that.

MM93 gave an interview where he said the bikes are getting less manual, in that there use to be more things the rider had to do to manage the bike. This made for more errors and more opportunity for other racers.
 

Attachments

  • 603EC82E-7FE1-4BFD-886F-AC1EE6E368E0.jpeg
    603EC82E-7FE1-4BFD-886F-AC1EE6E368E0.jpeg
    67.5 KB
Its super hard to gauge the effectiveness of aero just off of one track too. I don't think anyone can make a reasonable argument against a statement that the bikes are getting faster as a result of the evolution of technology and riding style.

Aero is a part of that.

MM93 gave an interview where he said the bikes are getting less manual, in that there use to be more things the rider had to do to manage the bike. This made for more errors and more opportunity for other racers.

Before MotoGP nerfed the aero arms race Ducati had multiple wing setups for different tracks, just like F1….some tracks it’s better to have less downforce and less drag, other tracks it’s better to have more downforce and sacrifice having more drag.

I opted for their greatest downforce version, knowing I was gunna create drag, because I’m not fast enough yet to be doing close to 200 mph straights lol, but want the increased stability and grip.

Fairly easy to change the attack angle of the bottom wings later for less drag if I want to.
 
Its super hard to gauge the effectiveness of aero just off of one track too. I don't think anyone can make a reasonable argument against a statement that the bikes are getting faster as a result of the evolution of technology and riding style.

Aero is a part of that.

MM93 gave an interview where he said the bikes are getting less manual, in that there use to be more things the rider had to do to manage the bike. This made for more errors and more opportunity for other racers.

Maybe. Maybe not. Either way, it’s a data point.

IMO, aero is like smoke and mirrors - manipulation. Not only does it lend little or nothing to the quality of the racing, but also it eventually detracts from it (as we’re already seeing only a couple years into it - the wake from the lead rider impeding the following rider).

We started with frontal wings, then side wings, then swingarm scoops, then downwash ducts, then ground effects belly pans, then tail wings.

For what - a few tenths of a second over the non-aero bikes. lol
 
Maybe. Maybe not. Either way, it’s a data point.

IMO, aero is like smoke and mirrors - manipulation. Not only does it lend little or nothing to the quality of the racing, but also it eventually detracts from it (as we’re already seeing only a couple years into it - the wake from the lead rider impeding the following rider).

We started with frontal wings, then side wings, then swingarm scoops, then downwash ducts, then ground effects belly pans, then tail wings.

For what - a few tenths of a second over the non-aero bikes. lol

A few tenths a lap, equal multiple seconds by the end of the race.

And at this level, those tenths cost big dollar.
 
A few tenths a lap, equal multiple seconds by the end of the race.

And at this level, those tenths cost big dollar.

Sure. :)

But does that impact the quality of the racing, or your enjoyment of it as you watch? It doesn’t for me. I like close racing with passing, especially for the lead. If that’s happening, I doubt most people would notice (or care) if they’re turning 1:20.1 or 1:20.2 lap times.
 
Maybe. Maybe not. Either way, it’s a data point.

IMO, aero is like smoke and mirrors - manipulation. Not only does it lend little or nothing to the quality of the racing, but also it eventually detracts from it (as we’re already seeing only a couple years into it - the wake from the lead rider impeding the following rider).

We started with frontal wings, then side wings, then swingarm scoops, then downwash ducts, then ground effects belly pans, then tail wings.

For what - a few tenths of a second over the non-aero bikes. lol

That’s why they have racing classifications. There has to be a top class where you are pushing the envelope. Frankly I’d like to see no rules other than safety and maybe a spending cap in both F1 and MotoGP, other than that no holds barred on who can get the car around the track the fastest in those two classifications.

The other classes of racing, can have more equalizer rules because they are not about a team and driver producing the fastest result, they are about people racing people on a relatively equal playing field.

But at the very top, there has to be envelope pushing.

I’d love to see an open class car race series for cars where the only rules were a standardized survival envelope for the pilot, and maybe a cap of $120,000,000 on car development and build per season.
 
Great Latte holders for sure. We can't stop progress I Guess. We're approaching the limits of hp and traction given a set contact patch. Another 100hp
wouldn't yield much faster lap times on a bike due to rideability and traction. Electronics can sort it out up to a certain point. All the lattes in the world haven't helped me
shave lap times, boo hoo...
 
Its super hard to gauge the effectiveness of aero just off of one track too. I don't think anyone can make a reasonable argument against a statement that the bikes are getting faster as a result of the evolution of technology and riding style.

Aero is a part of that.

MM93 gave an interview where he said the bikes are getting less manual, in that there use to be more things the rider had to do to manage the bike. This made for more errors and more opportunity for other racersAls

Also looking at just lap time doesnt tell the whole story, look at whole racetime - most races were well faster
 

Register CTA

Register on Ducati Forum! This sidebar will go away, and you will see fewer ads.
Back
Top