- Joined
- May 28, 2022
- Messages
- 2,900
- Location
- USA
Actually, and as much as I'd hate to let facts get in the way of another argument, he did mention it prior to your post.
84 pages and 3-4 posts per day. I guess I missed it...
Actually, and as much as I'd hate to let facts get in the way of another argument, he did mention it prior to your post.
84 pages and 3-4 posts per day. I guess I missed it...
Page 80 on Friday. I also quoted Steven's post where he mentioned this four posts above your post saying Steven hadn't mentioned.
No biggie, just a point of order.
Point of Order........ let me google that for you!
I like the shape at the back of the tank...........but why couldn't they make it to the correct shape of the rest of the bikes fairings etc?
A quick search of the internets will yield you that answer… no need for practical experience
Ah google to the rescue.....instant expert well done.
Weird how you’re the only one who thinks I’m an expert…
It's made for 2022+ fairings, he mocked it up with -2021 fairings.but why couldn't they make it to the correct shape of the rest of the bikes fairings etc?
I like the shape at the back of the tank...........but why couldn't they make it to the correct shape of the rest of the bikes fairings etc?
Be careful with that flex. If you notice it at standstill, I’d imagine you’d exert more than that through a corner (I think it’s called a resultant force if I remember correctly from college physics). A g-out cambered corner will put even more stress on it. 60° (combined bike and camber) equals about 1.7 G according to some math nerds on the Keith Code forum. Combine that with a stable long-term temp of only 125°C (257°F), I hope the plastic doesn’t deform Does RG mention anything about weight limits or flexing?