- Joined
- Aug 8, 2012
- Messages
- 6,386
- Location
- Dallas.Tx
the prize will be bragging rights for being correct. What did you expect, a cookie?![]()
A box of cookies...at the very least
the prize will be bragging rights for being correct. What did you expect, a cookie?![]()
Seems to get it off of the end caps of the pipes, but I could see baked-on being a different issue.
Someone already dynoed at 177, but since it's your bike I bumped it up a little.
correct... The conditions here in the SF Bay Area are quite variable; at the ocean, you get cold dense air that's quite damp.. You are at, or close to absolute sea level. Inland, it gets higher and warmer, but still really good conditions.. The only downside is that our gasoline is utter crap...Dynos easily vary by 10-15+% from location to location, then there's ambient temp, RH, elevation, etc. Relative numbers are more insightful - this is the same dyno he tested the S1000RR on
Bike was 183 hp and 97 ft-lb with stock exhaust.
Not bad at all...
When you overlay it over the 1199's graph, it looks absurd.
It is proving to be very much more difficult to set up. The midrange torque is absurd, and it does all kinds of lively things the old bike didn't do. I've only ridden it a couple times, but I am still much slower on it than on the 1199R.
Because of having to manage the torque/the 14R is just a little bit sharper or just new bike and getting used to it?