Are you serious? It gives you the option of not using the DDA. Instead put a camera on the tank and record your ride. Review your video and see exactly how much lean angle you're carrying in any given corner. It's a useful tool to indicate just how much speed and lean angle you're carrying in order to gain confidence on your ride whether on track or street.
^ Just let it go bro! No matter how right or wrong you are someone here knows it all and will argue with you. Don't even waste your time
Are you serious? It gives you the option of not using the DDA. Instead put a camera on the tank and record your ride. Review your video and see exactly how much lean angle you're carrying in any given corner. It's a useful tool to indicate just how much speed and lean angle you're carrying in order to gain confidence on your ride whether on track or street.
...however I am sure you have seen more than a few who try to be canyon superstars and end up in an ambulance or worse.
Same goes for track superstars.
Injuries are usually more manageable, but logic is same. Geographical location (ie: track or street) unfortunately doesn't equate to common sense. Anyone trying to watch a dash readout while in a turn doesn't make sense to me.
I guess I took that for granted when looking at this as readout as being good info or a tool.
On behalf of your local motorcycle Insurance wholesaler (the one who buys crashed bikes from insurance companies and sells them for parts or to racers) I would like to take a minute to thank everyone who has contributed to this thread and especially those who continue to attempt a higher lean angle number..
wow..now I have seen everything..LOL
I am glad motorcycle manufacturers do not design bikes based on idiots out there otherwise there wouldnt be a bike that goes faster than the legal speed limit for road bikes. Manufacturers assumes you have common sense to ride a superbike and yes there are idiots out there that will look at the lean angle indicator/speed/lap time etc while in a lean, but for me the more data they can bring out of the bike the better. To me its no difference than some who mount GPS/smart phones on their bikes, not that I have anything against people who do but they are all distractions and you have to use common sense when to use it.
the new R1 has braking indicators i suppose there will be idiots that will be looking at how hard they are breaking before a corner instead of looking for the Apex or seeing what point they can brake to do a stoppie?
There were warning labels not to use the microwave to dry off living objects...
Interesting (& spirited! ) discussion. Not seeing much practical use for the LAS to be honest, other than a novelty. I suppose it might be of use to correlate lean angle reading (after the ride, of course) with visible tire wear to match a number with where the tread edge of a given tire is, but even for that use the sensor doesn't know anything about surface camber; so 50 degrees from vertical on a flat road versus a banked or off-camber one doesn't equal the same thing. And on its own, it doesn't tell you much of use. To really be useful you'd have to have other data streams to match with it, and that puts you into DDA and telemetry analysis, which is a whole other level.