I don't think I have to considering a heavier BMW HP4 with claimed 193HP goes by your R with a relative ease....unless German horses are just simply stronger then the Italian ones.
You and Dennis could drink from the same Ducati Kool Aid keg all you want, and I'll stick to my healthy suspicions.
I don't think I have to considering a heavier BMW HP4 with claimed 193HP goes by your R with a relative ease
a couple of things come to mind: ship/release dates, performance claims, issues with first year models
Also, the marketing department does a great job in stirring up expectations and excitement but when your bike does leave you stranded and sits in the shop months at a time until DNA finally pulls their head out of their rear, the customer might feel somewhat slighted.
Don't get me wrong anti, I have bought three ducs and I'm not considering riding anything else.
Ducati North America or a dealer?how about when they tell you there is no "r" coming out only to have one a year later. Then a RR a year after that.
If your claim is that your Panigale engine does not deliver the Ducati claimed 195 HP, then yes, yes you do. Using an imagined arbitrary example involving someone else's bike under an uncontrolled environment would not be considered conclusive evidence to substantiate your claim.
Ducati North America or a dealer?
I do not make a claim but rather suspect, and yes, I base it on circumstantial evidence....but then again, based of your post also as a circumstantial evidence, I suspect if someone were to run the engine on a dyno and to come up short of Ducati's 195HP, you'd be questioning that dyno's calibration......
how about when they tell you there is no "r" coming out only to have one a year later. Then a RR a year after that.
In this case it wouldn't even qualify as circumstantial evidence considering the claim is manifested from a fictitious scenario. For every forum post of a BMW outpacing a Panigale, there is another stating the opposite. There would certainly be variables associated with any testing method, including dyno calibration, but as variables are more effectively controlled, conclusions can be made with greater accuracy. An engine dyno would be a good step towards testing your suspicions under a more sufficiently controlled environment.
how about when they tell you there is no "r" coming out only to have one a year later. Then a RR a year after that.
How about you spare me the suspense and share your evidence, other than the claim by Ducati marketing department, that the engine produces 195HP?
They represent Ducati though and, although this is off topic a bit, never once saw anything saying Ducati would come out with either of those models. Even on these forums where news usually breaks first everyone said no R was in the works according to ducati.
It's just annoying to release so many variations so close together and not tell anyone. They know what they are doing though cause you have people that will sell their bikes for a loss to buy the new one even though they have only had it a short time. Ducati knows how to get people suckered in.