- Joined
- Oct 25, 2020
- Messages
- 1,611
- Location
- Lusail
Even though this thread and this oil are quite ridiculous they are not as ridiculous as the notion that this oil was developed with contingencies for an oil leak in mind.
Andy this forum is quadrupal redundant to your info. You repeated everything I said and as always add nothing of relevance to a conversation. You don't even own a R so your comments are pointless related to this clutch or oil, you use neither. I'll dig to China if needed to prove a point. We now have people with knowledge of the seal package needing to be upgraded. I think that's gold in the hole. Any debate there?
Thank you JOS and Sutki, that is some great on seal packages being upgraded over the past few years. I would suspect it would be an upgraded labyrinth seal.
The seal package/leak path was in question, due to the new oil being dry specific. The forum wasn't sure if/how the new oil helps to manage clutch dust blow by controlling the dust with friction modifiers, and where the extra 3.5hp comes from. A few S owners got caught up on the mention of the wet clutch and that somehow took topic
Even though this thread and this oil are quite ridiculous they are not as ridiculous as the notion that this oil was developed with contingencies for an oil leak in mind.
On a completely separate note and where the thread got off topic, one would assume clutch slippage is basic info, but some think that's all to be said. Fill oil, push clutch, pull gas, that seems to be the a train of thought on this clutch debate or motorcycle performance in general. Do you think we need your comment about oil weights related to clutch slippage if we run a dry clutch? I'll double down this quid on a nag with 3 left feet....
Obviously it's dry. What's being debated is the friction modifiers added to dilute the clutch dust generated
All this time I’ve been pulling the clutch and twisting the gas. Damn.
And I don’t have an R (anymore) or an S, just a base. But it has a dry clutch! So, am I in or out?
Well let me send out a beer, if there's info to debate I don't mind and any V4 with a dry clutch is relevant to this thread! I had a bone stock 959 before a V4 so I'm not knocking the choice of hardware on any bike
And the clutch dust is not drivel, you missed a few others mentioning the seals! Granted who knows if the oil pertains to any clutch dust, it may or may not, only Corse knows why the seal package was updated
View attachment 51552
So we have the "dry clutch oil", made by Ducati. No one questions the dry clutch portion, with changes at 600 miles regardless. Someone please claim Ducati is wrong by that or explain their reasoning behind such a bold statement of a dry clutch oil, since folks seem to think that term doesn't apply
We have a wet clutch oil, that circulates said wet clutch oil, in with motor oil, so we're still "cleaning" a a wet clutch and using contaminated oil from the clutch that is made regardless if it's wet or dry. That's why you change the engine oil at intervals, correct?
So please tell me, why is there a "wet clutch" oil, aside from the obvious fact the clutch utilizes the oil weights while at rpm/pressure. These oils are almost a marketing gimmick for the uneducated and you pad pockets by not doing your research, but you get what you pay for/want when you do the research