Statement from Mat Mladin regarding Pedrosa’s recent performances and MotoGP more generally is circulating social media:
“How do we explain that a rider who never won a MotoGP world championship, who retired five years ago, who hasn't been on the podium in six years, who's best finish in the championship of second was over a decade ago can show up and make most of the best riders in the world look slow? Of course Dani is talented and even some past world champions like Casey and Lorenzo speak highly of him but a racer who has been out of it for a very long time returns to racing a couple of times per year as a paid test rider and beats up on the blokes who we are being told are next level and a different breed of human. Dani was near the top of the game but that was a long time ago in racing terms.
I would be comfortable saying that many team managers are saying nice things for the TV but the likes of KTM and Ducati are very tough organisations professionally. They are not seeing all of this as a beautiful fairytale for Dani, they are asking serious questions inside their respective organisations. There are a few guys in the minibike class looking to move up, with one of them guaranteed a seat in GP for 24.
How can any rider on that grid spin the fact they got beat in two races by Dani quite handily. I also felt great for Dani, this fairy tale of a retired X racer and how great it is for him personally to be achieving these results that honestly he shouldn't be. It's beautiful warm and mushy but it's embarrassing for the blokes he did flog. Atleast it should be
There is no doubt that MotoGP bikes are a specialist racing machine these days. You don't just show up from superbike anymore without GP experience and the bike still feels like a "motorbike". From what I see and speaking with someone who raced one not too long ago, those bikes are incredibly difficult to "get used to" but if you've been there long enough, as many in that paddock have essentially grown up in GP, they are not incredibly difficult to "ride" at a decent clip. Electronics are playing a big part but of course as witnessed last weekend, the world champ got fired over the bars, so if you get it wrong enough, even the electronics won't save you. The lack of movement in the bikes, the lack of sideways action and tire smoke these days highlights how controlled they are. Funnily the world champs boss last Friday at Misano was quoted regarding his crash " We looked at the data and nothing wrong with the bike and no mistake by the rider". Heck it must have been magic. I wish my crew would have said the same every time they had to work until midnight fixing one that I bent. They were saying "that ...... cost us a nice dinner and cold beer tonight"
Simon said at Mugello when he rode one of the bikes for a few laps that he couldn't believe he could hold it wide open down the front straight and the stability he felt nearing 350kmh when back in his two banger 500cc days he was scared to hold it wide open at 300kmh.
I watched a sit down interview with Mick and Casey recently and Casey stated that risking the high side by getting the power on just a bit earlier than the bloke in front, trying to set up a pass on the brakes in the next corner is essentially negated now by electronics and they atleast personally believe the aero and electronics need to be rolled back. I see both sides of the argument because I'm an X racer who wanted to win by outsmarting my competitor or being fitter and so on but I also see how much closer the racing is now they have numbed the bikes down with electronics and aero and how that appeals to many. I have mates who prefer the tire smoking two bangers and don't care if one guy wins by 20 seconds and mates who prefer the close racing and couldn't care less that the bikes look like slot cars in comparison to the 500's or even the early four strokes.
When I was a boy
in GP, there was no one showing up on occasion, let alone being retired from professional racing for 5 years and racing with Mick, Kev and Rainey. Not only were they ridiculously fast they were ridiculously "no way is that ...... beating me" if you get what I mean. It's funny people say to me that I raced against the greats of GP racing and I laugh and say I was in the same race, very different to racing against them. Whether I think given the right team and timing and so on I could have done better is beside the point and always has been to me. That way of thinking just puts it inline with current standards which make me want to beat my TV to death when I hear the same stuff nowadays.
Racing is a tough game and the constant excuses that are made for the riders in the world's main category of motorcycle racing is the reason Dani can show up all these years later and do what he is doing. The cuddles and kisses, the participation awards and the but but buts and if if ifs is why Dani is still able to challenge for podiums.
There are 8 Ducati's, 4 KTM's and 4 very capable Aprilias on that grid. I don't have enough fingers but I think that's 16 very good motorcycles in the hands of "the next stars". Dani shouldn't be showing up on occasion and beating the majority of them let alone sniffing out a couple of podiums
And no I'm not saying I could have beat any of them in my day, it's purely an opinion piece written by a bloke with a little bit of racing experience so don't get all wound up and let me ruin your day, heck I was just a lowly superbike rider and won a few dirt bike races when I was a kid but the elephant is in the room
Writing all of this about electronics reminds me of when we "the Yoshimura Suzuki" team were being accused of cheating by using traction control when it wasn't allowed. Watch how fast Mladin opens the throttle they'd say. So to stop the evil empire, the AMA opened up the rules to allow a full suite of electronics from the Utah race in 2006. From that very race meeting, Ben, myself and our Yoshimura Suzuki team went on a 46 race win streak that I kept going seven races into 2009, all up ending at 53 race wins after Ben had gone to Europe. A story for another time
.”