- Joined
- Jan 11, 2018
- Messages
- 371
- Location
- Southern California
So the question now is: "Who's STILL buying one?" lol
If my SP2 doesn't pan out, I might.
So the question now is: "Who's STILL buying one?" lol
Nah. The last minute shuffle was bc of marketing. BMW upstaged them w the new M1000RR, which had more significant updates especially when it comes to aero. Gigi is probably losing sleep with BMW one-upping them in this dept.
This 2023 V4R has been in the pipeline for at least a year. Production lead times are at least 6 months for the new engine bits (conrods, pistons, cam, and clutch). Then testing. And then you have to factor in the a couple months for marketing to make this video.
Are you sure you aren't referring to British Sterling? The Euro and USD are not far from parity. 40K Euro is about $39K USD.
The bike is 44,999 usd which should mean it’s a little over 45k euros
have they moved the price cap?
Considering that this bike is to meet racing homologation, I see why Ducati focused mainly on engine improvements. The ability to rev to 16.5k while maintaining durability (same maintenance routine as a normal Desmosidici Stradale engine) is a big improvement for race teams. In WSBK that’s trimmed to 16.1 so there’s even more headroom on durability. And they’ve made improvements on power and engine response. To make 4 hp on oil alone is kind of a big deal (race teams would be all over that). Pistons and rotating assembly have to be the same as homologation. It sounds like they optimized the variable intake system, which has to remain as homologated. They didn’t spend money on things that do not benefit the technical regulations thus increasing margins. I mean basically you’re buying a Superbike bottom end with parts off the shelf to produce a motorcyle that will meet Euro5/CARB standards in street form. That’s it. Once a team gets one of these bikes, it gets stripped and 95% of the parts are replaced (less if you’re running Superstock rules).
I guess the big question is how do you justify a $40k Ducati that doesn’t have a great track record (pun intended) racing when you could buy another platform with more pedigree (i.e. Kawasaki or Yamaha) and better factory support. A GYTR-prepped R1 is 25-30k euro and you can buy the Pro kit for probably another 10-15k and get a pretty close to WSBK spec bike.
https://www.motorcyclenews.com/news/new-bikes/2023-yamaha-r1-gytr-pro-r6-r7/
In regard to the 2nd part of this.Considering that this bike is to meet racing homologation, I see why Ducati focused mainly on engine improvements. The ability to rev to 16.5k while maintaining durability (same maintenance routine as a normal Desmosidici Stradale engine) is a big improvement for race teams. In WSBK that’s trimmed to 16.1 so there’s even more headroom on durability. And they’ve made improvements on power and engine response. To make 4 hp on oil alone is kind of a big deal (race teams would be all over that). Pistons and rotating assembly have to same as homologation. It sounds like they optimized the variable intake system, which has to remain as homologated. They didn’t spend money on things that do not benefit the technical regulations thus increasing margins. I mean basically you’re buying a Superbike bottom end with parts off the shelf to produce a motorcyle that will meet Euro5/CARB standards in street form. That’s it. Once a team gets one of these bikes, it gets stripped and 95% of the parts are replaced (less if you’re running Superstock rules).
I guess the big question is how do you justify a $40k Ducati that doesn’t have a great track record (pun intended) racing when you could buy another platform with more pedigree (i.e. Kawasaki or Yamaha) and better factory support. A GYTR-prepped R1 is 25-30k euro and you can buy the Pro kit for probably another 10-15k and get a pretty close to WSBK spec bike.
https://www.motorcyclenews.com/news/new-bikes/2023-yamaha-r1-gytr-pro-r6-r7/
Homologation numbers are strictly to satisfy WSBK, no? Do you have to strip off that much of the team is getting a RS?Once a team gets one of these bikes, it gets stripped and 95% of the parts are replaced (less if you’re running Superstock rules).
Homologation numbers are strictly to satisfy WSBK, no? Do you have to strip off that much of the team is getting a RS?
The factory bikes are special built units, not “stripped down” stock bikes.
They head to the teams from Corse, and very little additional modification happens.
I know... I was wording my question subtly so as to not appear on the attack. The F22 I rode (Rinaldi's) was nothing like the V4R with the exception of the slow ass rider on it who tends to ride R bikes.
It feels familiar, but ultimately is much more refined and radically different.