- Joined
- Dec 18, 2020
- Messages
- 1,217
- Location
- Italy
I guess 622,000 dead people would have an opinion on that if they were still alive. You have illustrated the main point, it's not about healthy rugged individualist you, it's about the other person who is more vulnerable like say grandma or some immune compromised person that an unvaccinated person is far more likely to spread it too. So the question is; does personal freedom outweigh civic responsibility?
As for invermectin in India, its ........
No data available to suggest a link between India’s reduction of COVID-19 cases and the use of ivermectin
India experienced a decrease in the number of COVID-19 cases in May 2021. However, no data is available to support the claim that this is causally associated with the recommendation to use ivermectin. The slow down of the disease spreading began before India released official recommendations to...healthfeedback.org
That was in May, since then they have dropped the quackery
DGHS drops Ivermectin, Doxycycline from Covid-19 treatment; ICMR rules unchanged
The revised guidelines have also dropped drugs such as hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc and multivitamins, that were earlier prescribed by doctors to treat asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic Covid-19 patients.www.indiatoday.in
That article does not state it was a quackery. It’s says it’s undecided and has stopped issuing medicine for the non-symptomatic.
that was June.
look at India's numbers now:
How is that quackery if it worked for a country of a billion living on top of each other? Looks like it worked.
There is some strong information bias here.