Well it’s more like now stuck in a perpetual u turn than sideways. This stuff is so simple it’s hard to process that there is actually a thread on it. First is the erroneous assumption that something is supposed to be a certain way. This was my point on the different triples. Unless absolutely stated to be a “drop in replacement” for an existing part, the manufacturer can make the dimensions whatever they want. To then post that the manufacturer “screwed up” is nonsense.
I have in my possession 4 different triples for the 99 platform. The center distance of all of these clamps is different. If I’m going to select/mix and match manufacturers components to build a front end, I most assuredly assume that somewhere in the engineering of the assembly that I’m going to have to do a little massaging to get all of these parts to work harmoniously.
It’s just a given.
Now this completely assumes the “builder” knows WTF they are doing going into this which could be an entirely different conversation. So in conclusion, there’s nothing wrong with the IMA clamps. IMA didn’t screw up. They make an aftermarket part. It is entirely up to the buyer to determine beforehand if the components that constitute their assembly will be compatible and what the necessary steps would be to ensure that if it’s not a simple bolt on replacement.
If the buyer didn’t do the diligence prior to purchase, then as Don said, easiest way to determine compatibility is to compare the clamps using the fork legs as a jig. If it’s off and you don’t have the skills or resources to modify to fit, send the parts back. Pretty simple.
Don with regard to the front wheel bearings, they are not “laterally loaded. There is a center spacer between the bearings that has a “no L load” precision sandwich. So if your question “am I causing a radial load between bearing and it’s case, the answer is no. It is impossible to mess this assembly up. I surmise I should add “for most people